Combining Texts
Ideas for
'The Case for Closure', 'De formis' and 'Ignorance: a Case for Scepticism'
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these texts
display all the ideas for this combination of texts
6 ideas
13. Knowledge Criteria / A. Justification Problems / 2. Justification Challenges / c. Knowledge closure
19551
|
How can we know the heavyweight implications of normal knowledge? Must we distort 'knowledge'? [Hawthorne]
|
19552
|
We wouldn't know the logical implications of our knowledge if small risks added up to big risks [Hawthorne]
|
19554
|
Denying closure is denying we know P when we know P and Q, which is absurd in simple cases [Hawthorne]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 6. Contextual Justification / b. Invariantism
8724
|
The meaning of 'know' does not change from courtroom to living room [Unger]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / D. Scepticism / 1. Scepticism
8722
|
No one knows anything, and no one is ever justified or reasonable [Unger]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / D. Scepticism / 4. Demon Scepticism
8723
|
An evil scientist may give you a momentary life, with totally false memories [Unger]
|