Combining Texts
Ideas for
'Philosophical Fragments', 'Evidence' and 'On Propositions: What they are, and Meaning'
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these texts
display all the ideas for this combination of texts
8 ideas
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 3. Evidentialism / a. Evidence
19684
|
Does spotting a new possibility count as evidence? [McGrew]
|
19687
|
Absence of evidence proves nothing, and weird claims need special evidence [McGrew]
|
19688
|
Every event is highly unlikely (in detail), but may be perfectly plausible [McGrew]
|
19686
|
Criminal law needs two separate witnesses, but historians will accept one witness [McGrew]
|
19680
|
Maybe all evidence consists of beliefs, rather than of facts [McGrew]
|
19681
|
If all evidence is propositional, what is the evidence for the proposition? Do we face a regress? [McGrew]
|
19689
|
Several unreliable witnesses can give good support, if they all say the same thing [McGrew]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 3. Evidentialism / b. Evidentialism
19683
|
Narrow evidentialism relies wholly on propositions; the wider form includes other items [McGrew]
|