Combining Texts
Ideas for
'Classical Cosmology (frags)', 'In Defence of Pure Reason' and 'Contextualism Defended (and reply)'
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these texts
display all the ideas for this combination of texts
11 ideas
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 4. Foundationalism / d. Rational foundations
3706
|
A priori justification can vary in degree [Bonjour]
|
3696
|
A priori justification requires understanding but no experience [Bonjour]
|
3703
|
You can't explain away a priori justification as analyticity, and you can't totally give it up [Bonjour]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 4. Foundationalism / f. Foundationalism critique
3699
|
The induction problem blocks any attempted proof of physical statements [Bonjour]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 1. External Justification
3701
|
Externalist theories of justification don't require believers to have reasons for their beliefs [Bonjour]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 6. Contextual Justification / a. Contextualism
19558
|
Our own intuitions about whether we know tend to vacillate [Cohen,S]
|
19561
|
We shouldn't jump too quickly to a contextualist account of claims to know [Cohen,S]
|
19563
|
The context sensitivity of knowledge derives from its justification [Cohen,S]
|
19560
|
Contextualism is good because it allows knowledge, but bad because 'knowing' is less valued [Cohen,S]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 10. Anti External Justification
3702
|
Externalism means we have no reason to believe, which is strong scepticism [Bonjour]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / D. Scepticism / 6. Scepticism Critique
19559
|
Contextualists slightly concede scepticism, but only in extremely strict contexts [Cohen,S]
|