display all the ideas for this combination of texts
5 ideas
17546 | If you changed one of Newton's concepts you would destroy his whole system [Heisenberg on Newton] |
Full Idea: The connection between the different concept in [Newton's] system is so close that one could generally not change any one of the concepts without destroying the whole system | |
From: comment on Isaac Newton (Principia Mathematica [1687]) by Werner Heisenberg - Physics and Philosophy 06 | |
A reaction: This holistic situation would seem to count against Newton's system, rather than for it. A good system should depend on nature, not on other parts of the system. Compare changing a rule of chess. |
17027 | Science deduces propositions from phenomena, and generalises them by induction [Newton] |
Full Idea: In experimental philosophy, propositions are deduced from the phenomena and are made general by induction. | |
From: Isaac Newton (Principia Mathematica [1687], Bk 3 Gen Schol) | |
A reaction: Sounds easy, but generalising by induction requires all sorts of assumptions about the stability of natural kinds. Since the kinds are only arrived at by induction, it is not easy to give a proper account here. |
17021 | Natural effects of the same kind should be assumed to have the same causes [Newton] |
Full Idea: The causes assigned to natural effects of the same kind must be, so far as possible, the same. For example, the cause of respiration in man and beast. | |
From: Isaac Newton (Principia Mathematica [1687], Bk 3 Rule 2) | |
A reaction: It is impossible to rule out identical effects from differing causes, but explanation gets much more exciting (because wide-ranging) if Newton's rule is assumed. |
17022 | We should admit only enough causes to explain a phenomenon, and no more [Newton] |
Full Idea: No more causes of natural things should be admitted than are both true and sufficient to explain the phenomena. …For nature does nothing in vain, …and nature is simple and does not indulge in the luxury of superfluous causes. | |
From: Isaac Newton (Principia Mathematica [1687], Bk 3 Rule 1) | |
A reaction: This emphasises that Ockham's Razor is a rule for physical explanation, and not just one for abstract theories. This is something like Van Fraassen's 'empirical adequacy'. |
17026 | From the phenomena, I can't deduce the reason for the properties of gravity [Newton] |
Full Idea: I have not as yet been able to deduce from the phenomena the reason for the properties of gravity. | |
From: Isaac Newton (Principia Mathematica [1687], Bk 3 Gen Schol) | |
A reaction: I take it that giving the reasons for the properties of gravity would be an essentialist explanation. I am struck by the fact that the recent discovery of the Higgs Boson appears to give us a reason why things have mass (i.e. what causes mass). |