Combining Texts
Ideas for
'The Value of Science', 'Causation and Explanation' and 'Prescriptivism'
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these texts
display all the ideas for this combination of texts
11 ideas
14. Science / A. Basis of Science / 4. Prediction
4808
|
If we say where Mars was two months ago, we offer an explanation without a prediction [Psillos]
|
4807
|
A good barometer will predict a storm, but not explain it [Psillos]
|
14. Science / C. Induction / 4. Reason in Induction
4811
|
Induction (unlike deduction) is non-monotonic - it can be invalidated by new premises [Psillos]
|
14. Science / D. Explanation / 2. Types of Explanation / a. Types of explanation
4812
|
Explanation is either showing predictability, or showing necessity, or showing causal relations [Psillos]
|
14. Science / D. Explanation / 2. Types of Explanation / e. Lawlike explanations
4802
|
Just citing a cause does not enable us to understand an event; we also need a relevant law [Psillos]
|
4804
|
The 'covering law model' says only laws can explain the occurrence of single events [Psillos]
|
4805
|
If laws explain the length of a flagpole's shadow, then the shadow also explains the length of the pole [Psillos]
|
14. Science / D. Explanation / 2. Types of Explanation / g. Causal explanations
4395
|
There are non-causal explanations, most typically mathematical explanations [Psillos]
|
4806
|
An explanation can just be a 'causal story', without laws, as when I knock over some ink [Psillos]
|
14. Science / D. Explanation / 4. Explanation Doubts / a. Explanation as pragmatic
4404
|
Maybe explanation is entirely relative to the interests and presuppositions of the questioner [Psillos]
|
4803
|
An explanation is the removal of the surprise caused by the event [Psillos]
|