Combining Texts

Ideas for 'Two Problems of Epistemology', 'Mapping the Mind' and 'fragments/reports'

unexpand these ideas     |    start again     |     choose another area for these texts

display all the ideas for this combination of texts


4 ideas

15. Nature of Minds / A. Nature of Mind / 7. Animal Minds
No one knows if animals are conscious [Carter,R]
     Full Idea: No one knows if animals are conscious.
     From: Rita Carter (Mapping the Mind [1998], p.155)
     A reaction: This is a report from the front line of brain research, and should be born in mind when over-confident people make pronouncements about this topic. It strikes me as important to grasp that animals MIGHT not be conscious.
15. Nature of Minds / A. Nature of Mind / 8. Brain
Pain doesn't have one brain location, but is linked to attention and emotion [Carter,R]
     Full Idea: Scans show there is no such thing as a pain centre; pain springs mainly from the activation of areas associated with attention and emotion.
     From: Rita Carter (Mapping the Mind [1998], p. 12)
     A reaction: Most brain research points to the complex multi-layered nature of experiences that were traditionally considered simple. We can be distracted from a pain, and an enormous number of factors can affect our degree of dislike of a given pain.
Proper brains appear at seven weeks, and neonates have as many neurons as adults do [Carter,R]
     Full Idea: The main sections of the brain, including the cerebral cortex, are visible within seven weeks of conception, and by the time the child is born the brain contains as many neurons - about 100 billion - as it will have as an adult.
     From: Rita Carter (Mapping the Mind [1998], p. 17)
     A reaction: Of interest in the abortion debate, and also in thinking about personal identity. However, it seems clear that the number of connections, rather than neurons, is what really matters. A small infant may well lack personal identity.
In primates, brain size correlates closely with size of social group [Carter,R]
     Full Idea: Brain size in primates is closely associated with the size of the social group in which the animal lives.
     From: Rita Carter (Mapping the Mind [1998], p.257)
     A reaction: Intriguing. Humans can have huge social groups because of language, which suggests a chicken-or-egg question. Language, intelligence and size of social group must have expanded together in humans.