Combining Texts
Ideas for
'fragments/reports', 'Pyrrhonian Arguments (frags)' and 'The Rediscovery of the Mind'
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these texts
display all the ideas for this combination of texts
21 ideas
17. Mind and Body / A. Mind-Body Dualism / 2. Interactionism
3469
|
Mind and brain don't interact if they are the same [Searle]
|
17. Mind and Body / A. Mind-Body Dualism / 7. Zombies
3487
|
Without internal content, a zombie's full behaviour couldn't be explained [Searle]
|
17. Mind and Body / B. Behaviourism / 4. Behaviourism Critique
3458
|
Mental states only relate to behaviour contingently, not necessarily [Searle]
|
3485
|
Wanting H2O only differs from wanting water in its mental component [Searle]
|
17. Mind and Body / C. Functionalism / 1. Functionalism
3461
|
Functionalists like the externalist causal theory of reference [Searle]
|
17. Mind and Body / C. Functionalism / 7. Chinese Room
3496
|
A program for Chinese translation doesn't need to understand Chinese [Searle]
|
17. Mind and Body / C. Functionalism / 8. Functionalism critique
3499
|
Computation presupposes consciousness [Searle]
|
3501
|
If we are computers, who is the user? [Searle]
|
17. Mind and Body / D. Property Dualism / 3. Property Dualism
3456
|
Consciousness is a brain property as liquidity is a water property [Searle]
|
3455
|
Property dualists tend to find the mind-body problem baffling [Searle]
|
3475
|
Property dualism denies reductionism [Searle]
|
3453
|
Property dualism is the reappearance of Cartesianism [Searle]
|
17. Mind and Body / D. Property Dualism / 5. Supervenience of mind
3477
|
If mind-brain supervenience isn't causal, this implies epiphenomenalism [Searle]
|
3531
|
Mental events can cause even though supervenient, like the solidity of a piston [Searle]
|
3476
|
Mind and brain are supervenient in respect of cause and effect [Searle]
|
3478
|
Upwards mental causation makes 'supervenience' irrelevant [Searle]
|
17. Mind and Body / D. Property Dualism / 6. Mysterianism
3466
|
Consciousness seems indefinable by conditions or categories [Searle]
|
17. Mind and Body / E. Mind as Physical / 2. Reduction of Mind
3500
|
Can the homunculus fallacy be beaten by recursive decomposition? [Searle]
|
9317
|
Searle argues that biology explains consciousness, but physics won't explain biology [Searle, by Kriegel/Williford]
|
3474
|
If mind is caused by brain, does this mean mind IS brain? [Searle]
|
17. Mind and Body / E. Mind as Physical / 7. Anti-Physicalism / b. Multiple realisability
3497
|
If mind is multiply realisable, it is possible that anything could realise it [Searle]
|