Combining Texts

Ideas for 'works', 'No Moral Difference' and 'Contemporary Philosophy of Mind'

unexpand these ideas     |    start again     |     choose another area for these texts

display all the ideas for this combination of texts


3 ideas

19. Language / B. Reference / 3. Direct Reference / b. Causal reference
Causal theories of reference (by 'dubbing') don't eliminate meanings in the heads of dubbers [Rey]
     Full Idea: Causal histories may have some role to play in a theory of reference, but the chain of causation requires internal characterisations at each stage, and the original dubber had one thing rather than another in mind when dubbing.
     From: Georges Rey (Contemporary Philosophy of Mind [1997], 9.2.1)
     A reaction: The modern view of direct reference seems to prefer social context rather than a complete causal chain.
If meaning and reference are based on causation, then virtually everything has meaning [Rey]
     Full Idea: What is special about meaning? If meaning and reference are just the result of causal chains, almost everything will mean something, since almost everything is reliably caused by something.
     From: Georges Rey (Contemporary Philosophy of Mind [1997], 9.2.2)
     A reaction: It would be insane to think that all causal events produced meanings. It is probably better not to mention causation at all when discussing meaning.
19. Language / B. Reference / 4. Descriptive Reference / a. Sense and reference
Referential Opacity says truth is lost when you substitute one referring term ('mother') for another ('Jocasta') [Rey]
     Full Idea: Referential Opacity says you cannot preserve truth if you substitute one referring term for another ('Oedipus desires Jocasta', 'Oedipus desires his mother').
     From: Georges Rey (Contemporary Philosophy of Mind [1997], 2.5.6)
     A reaction: ….That is, in the context of expressing a propositional attitude. 'Oedipus desired his mother' was true. This idea requires some ignorance on the part of the person expressing the thought.