Combining Texts

Ideas for 'On the Question of Absolute Undecidability', 'Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus' and 'Reason, Truth and History'

unexpand these ideas     |    start again     |     choose another area for these texts

display all the ideas for this combination of texts


11 ideas

19. Language / A. Nature of Meaning / 2. Meaning as Mental
The 'form' of the picture is its possible combinations [Wittgenstein]
     Full Idea: The form of depiction is the possibility that the things are combined with one another as are the elements of the picture.
     From: Ludwig Wittgenstein (Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus [1921], 2.151)
     A reaction: This is why 'model' (or even 'simulation'?) is a better term than 'picture' for his proposal. Pictures are fixed, but models can be adjusted.
19. Language / A. Nature of Meaning / 4. Meaning as Truth-Conditions
To understand a proposition means to know what is the case if it is true [Wittgenstein]
     Full Idea: To understand a proposition means to know what is the case if it is true.
     From: Ludwig Wittgenstein (Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus [1921], 4.024)
     A reaction: This established the Frege truth-conditions theory of meaning, which was expanded by Davidson, and then possible worlds semantics. You can't assess truth without knowing meaning. Dummett says the two go together.
19. Language / A. Nature of Meaning / 5. Meaning as Verification
Good philosophy asserts science, and demonstrates the meaninglessness of metaphysics [Wittgenstein]
     Full Idea: The correct method in philosophy would be to say nothing except what can be said, i.e. propositions of natural science, and whenever someone wanted to say something metaphysical, to show that he had failed to give a meaning to signs in his propositions.
     From: Ludwig Wittgenstein (Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus [1921], 6.53)
     A reaction: This seems to be the germ of logical positivism, picked up by the Vienna Circle, and passed on the Ayer and co. How, though, do you 'show' that a sign is meaningless? Very abstract ideas are too far away from experience to be analysed that way.
19. Language / B. Reference / 3. Direct Reference / c. Social reference
Neither individual nor community mental states fix reference [Putnam]
     Full Idea: Mental state (in either the individualistic or the collective sense) does not fix reference.
     From: Hilary Putnam (Reason, Truth and History [1981], Ch.2)
     A reaction: The idea that communities fix reference seems to me plausible. See Tyler Burge on this.
Maybe the total mental state of a language community fixes the reference of a term [Putnam]
     Full Idea: One might concede that the reference of a person's term isn't fixed by his individual mental state, but insist that the total mental state of all the members of the language community fixes the reference of the term.
     From: Hilary Putnam (Reason, Truth and History [1981], Ch.2)
     A reaction: I like this reading of the problem, though Putnam himself prefers to say that things fix the reference. I take reference to be a human action, not a natural causal relation. Animals connecting thought to object may not count as reference at all.
19. Language / C. Assigning Meanings / 4. Compositionality
Propositions use old expressions for a new sense [Wittgenstein]
     Full Idea: A proposition must use old expressions to communicate a new sense.
     From: Ludwig Wittgenstein (Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus [1921], 4.03)
     A reaction: A nicely expressed affirmation of the principle of compositionality. It entails that the propositions can be either true or false, according to LW.
Propositions are understood via their constituents [Wittgenstein]
     Full Idea: A proposition is understood by anyone who understands its constituents.
     From: Ludwig Wittgenstein (Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus [1921], 4.024)
     A reaction: The 'constituents' had better include the grammatical relationships. Otherwise it's 'rearrange these words to make a well known saying'. That said, this strikes me as an important truth about language. We assemble sentence meanings.
19. Language / D. Propositions / 2. Abstract Propositions / b. Propositions as possible worlds
Pictures are possible situations in logical space [Wittgenstein]
     Full Idea: A picture represents a possible situation in logical space.
     From: Ludwig Wittgenstein (Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus [1921], 2.202)
     A reaction: This seems pretty close to the idea that propositions are sets of possible worlds (though that seems to add unnecessary extra baggage). If they just picture situations, why does he mention logical space? Within the limits of possible picturing?
19. Language / F. Communication / 4. Private Language
Solipsism is correct, but can only be shown, not said, by the limits of my personal language [Wittgenstein]
     Full Idea: What the solipsist means is quite correct; only it cannot be said, but makes itself manifest. The world is my world: this is manifest in the fact that the limits of language (of that language which I alone understand) mean the limits of my world.
     From: Ludwig Wittgenstein (Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus [1921], 5.62)
     A reaction: I take it that LW later showed that the remark in brackets is absurd, using his Private Language argument. Commentators seem unclear about how seriously to take this claim.
19. Language / F. Communication / 6. Interpreting Language / a. Translation
We translate by means of proposition constituents, not by whole propositions [Wittgenstein]
     Full Idea: When translating one language into another, we do not proceed by translating each proposition of the one into a proposition of the other, but merely by translating the constituents of propositions.
     From: Ludwig Wittgenstein (Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus [1921], 4.025)
     A reaction: This seems opposed to Quine's later holistic view of translating whole languages. Is he objecting to Frege's context principle?
19. Language / F. Communication / 6. Interpreting Language / b. Indeterminate translation
There are infinitely many interpretations of a sentence which can all seem to be 'correct' [Putnam]
     Full Idea: There are always infinitely many different interpretations of the predicates of a language which assign 'correct' truth-values to the sentences in all possible worlds, no matter how those 'correct' truth-values are singled out.
     From: Hilary Putnam (Reason, Truth and History [1981], Ch.2)
     A reaction: Putnam says that he is using this argument from model theory to endorse the scepticism about 'gavagai' that Quine expressed in 1960. It is based on the ideas of Skolem, who was a renegade philosopher of mathematics. See Tim Button.