Combining Texts
Ideas for
'What Does It Take to Refer?', 'Empty Names' and 'Frege on Apriority (with ps)'
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these texts
display all the ideas for this combination of texts
14 ideas
19. Language / B. Reference / 1. Reference theories
10446
|
Fictional reference is different inside and outside the fiction [Bach]
|
10447
|
We can refer to fictional entities if they are abstract objects [Bach]
|
10443
|
You 'allude to', not 'refer to', an individual if you keep their identity vague [Bach]
|
19. Language / B. Reference / 4. Descriptive Reference / b. Reference by description
10439
|
What refers: indefinite or definite or demonstrative descriptions, names, indexicals, demonstratives? [Bach]
|
10441
|
If we can refer to things which change, we can't be obliged to single out their properties [Bach]
|
10442
|
We can think of an individual without have a uniquely characterizing description [Bach]
|
10445
|
It can't be real reference if it could refer to some other thing that satisfies the description [Bach]
|
10457
|
Since most expressions can be used non-referentially, none of them are inherently referential [Bach]
|
10463
|
Just alluding to or describing an object is not the same as referring to it [Bach]
|
19. Language / B. Reference / 5. Speaker's Reference
10459
|
Context does not create reference; it is just something speakers can exploit [Bach]
|
10460
|
'That duck' may not refer to the most obvious one in the group [Bach]
|
10461
|
What a pronoun like 'he' refers back to is usually a matter of speaker's intentions [Bach]
|
10462
|
Information comes from knowing who is speaking, not just from interpretation of the utterance [Bach]
|
19. Language / F. Communication / 5. Pragmatics / a. Contextual meaning
10458
|
People slide from contextual variability all the way to contextual determination [Bach]
|