Combining Texts

Ideas for 'On the Question of Absolute Undecidability', 'Action' and 'Unpublished Notebooks 1881-82'

unexpand these ideas     |    start again     |     choose another area for these texts

display all the ideas for this combination of texts


3 ideas

22. Metaethics / A. Ethics Foundations / 2. Source of Ethics / e. Human nature
We can aspire to greatness by creating new functions for ourselves [Nietzsche]
     Full Idea: To see the new greatness not above oneself, not outside oneself, but to make a new function from it.
     From: Friedrich Nietzsche (Unpublished Notebooks 1881-82 [1882], 13[19])
     A reaction: Thus we might combine the Aristotelian and the existentialist views! Do we discover our function or invent it? Anyone who acquires an expertise is creating a new function for themselves, presumably with a high value.
22. Metaethics / B. Value / 1. Nature of Value / c. Objective value
For absolute morality a goal for mankind is needed [Nietzsche]
     Full Idea: I deny absolute morality because I do not know an absolute goal of mankind.
     From: Friedrich Nietzsche (Unpublished Notebooks 1881-82 [1882], 11[037])
     A reaction: Christianity dreams of union of souls with God (clustering around God like goldfish to food, according to Dante). That is an absolute goal, justifying an absolute morality. If Aristotelians could identify human nature, its flourishing might be absolute.
22. Metaethics / C. The Good / 1. Goodness / g. Consequentialism
Humans are vividly aware of short-term effects, and almost ignorant of the long-term ones [Nietzsche]
     Full Idea: How weakly human beings feel responsible for their indirect and distant effects! And how cruelly and exaggeratedly the closest effect that we exert pounces on us - the effect we see, for which our myopic vision is still just sharp enough!
     From: Friedrich Nietzsche (Unpublished Notebooks 1881-82 [1882], 15[11])
     A reaction: This strikes me as both accurate and important, because consequentialist ethics is largely committed to judging by a very distorted image of their own objective.