Combining Texts
Ideas for
'Universal Prescriptivism', 'Three-Dimensionalism v Four-Dimensionalism' and 'Modal Logics and Philosophy'
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these texts
display all the ideas for this combination of texts
9 ideas
22. Metaethics / A. Ethics Foundations / 2. Source of Ethics / c. Ethical intuitionism
|
2705
|
How can intuitionists distinguish universal convictions from local cultural ones? [Hare]
|
|
2712
|
You can't use intuitions to decide which intuitions you should cultivate [Hare]
|
22. Metaethics / A. Ethics Foundations / 2. Source of Ethics / h. Expressivism
|
2706
|
Emotivists mistakenly think all disagreements are about facts, and so there are no moral reasons [Hare]
|
22. Metaethics / A. Ethics Foundations / 2. Source of Ethics / i. Prescriptivism
|
2709
|
Prescriptivism sees 'ought' statements as imperatives which are universalisable [Hare]
|
|
2704
|
If morality is just a natural or intuitive description, that leads to relativism [Hare]
|
|
2703
|
Descriptivism say ethical meaning is just truth-conditions; prescriptivism adds an evaluation [Hare]
|
|
2707
|
If there can be contradictory prescriptions, then reasoning must be involved [Hare]
|
|
2708
|
An 'ought' statement implies universal application [Hare]
|
|
2711
|
Prescriptivism implies a commitment, but descriptivism doesn't [Hare]
|