Combining Texts

Ideas for 'fragments/reports', 'Justice: What's the right thing to do?' and 'Centring'

unexpand these ideas     |    start again     |     choose another area for these texts

display all the ideas for this combination of texts


4 ideas

24. Political Theory / B. Nature of a State / 2. State Legitimacy / c. Social contract
Just visiting (and using roads) is hardly ratifying the Constitution [Sandel]
     Full Idea: It is hard to see how just passing through town is morally akin to ratifying the Constitution.
     From: Michael J. Sandel (Justice: What's the right thing to do? [2009], 06)
     A reaction: They say that philosophical ideas are never refuted, and no progress is made, but this sure put paid to John Locke.
24. Political Theory / B. Nature of a State / 3. Constitutions
A ratified constitution may not be a just constitution [Sandel]
     Full Idea: The fact that a constitution is ratified by the people does not prove that its provisions are just.
     From: Michael J. Sandel (Justice: What's the right thing to do? [2009], 06)
     A reaction: Yes indeed. And the fact that a majority won a referendum does not make their decision wise. Hence all constitutions must be open to evaluation. Gun laws in the US are the obvious example.
A just constitution harmonises the different freedoms [Sandel]
     Full Idea: As Kant sees it, a just constitution aims at harmonising each individual's freedom with that of everyone else.
     From: Michael J. Sandel (Justice: What's the right thing to do? [2009], 05)
     A reaction: [source?] Nice statement of the project. I increasingly see political philosophy as constitution design. I say philosophers have got fifty years to design an optimum constitution, and they should then down tools and promote it, in simple language.
24. Political Theory / D. Ideologies / 6. Liberalism / d. Liberal freedom
Liberal freedom was a response to assigned destinies like caste and class [Sandel]
     Full Idea: Liberal freedom developed as an antidote to political theories that consigned persons to destinies fixed by caste or class, station or rank, custom, tradition or inherited status.
     From: Michael J. Sandel (Justice: What's the right thing to do? [2009], 09)
     A reaction: Virtually all human beings before modern times found that they had been 'assigned destinies'. The huge exception is war, especially civil war, which must be a huge liberation for many people, despite the danger.