Combining Texts
Ideas for
'Commentary on 'De Anima'', 'Nature's Metaphysics' and 'The Elements of Law'
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these texts
display all the ideas for this combination of texts
11 ideas
26. Natural Theory / C. Causation / 4. Naturalised causation
9493
|
We should explain causation by powers, not powers by causation [Bird]
|
26. Natural Theory / C. Causation / 9. General Causation / b. Nomological causation
9494
|
Singularism about causes is wrong, as the universals involved imply laws [Bird]
|
26. Natural Theory / D. Laws of Nature / 1. Laws of Nature
9507
|
Laws are explanatory relationships of things, which supervene on their essences [Bird]
|
26. Natural Theory / D. Laws of Nature / 2. Types of Laws
9488
|
Laws are either disposition regularities, or relations between properties [Bird]
|
26. Natural Theory / D. Laws of Nature / 4. Regularities / a. Regularity theory
9496
|
That other diamonds are hard does not explain why this one is [Bird]
|
9479
|
Dispositional essentialism says laws (and laws about laws) are guaranteed regularities [Bird]
|
26. Natural Theory / D. Laws of Nature / 5. Laws from Universals
9473
|
Laws cannot offer unified explanations if they don't involve universals [Bird]
|
9484
|
If the universals for laws must be instantiated, a vanishing particular could destroy a law [Bird]
|
26. Natural Theory / D. Laws of Nature / 8. Scientific Essentialism / b. Scientific necessity
9506
|
Salt necessarily dissolves in water, because of the law which makes the existence of salt possible [Bird]
|
26. Natural Theory / D. Laws of Nature / 8. Scientific Essentialism / c. Essence and laws
23713
|
Most laws supervene on fundamental laws, which are explained by basic powers [Bird, by Friend/Kimpton-Nye]
|
26. Natural Theory / D. Laws of Nature / 9. Counterfactual Claims
9489
|
Essentialism can't use conditionals to explain regularities, because of possible interventions [Bird]
|