Combining Texts
Ideas for
'Does Emp.Knowledge have Foundation?', 'Dispositions' and 'Attitudes De Dicto and De Se'
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these texts
display all the ideas for this combination of texts
7 ideas
26. Natural Theory / B. Natural Kinds / 4. Source of Kinds
|
14344
|
Natural kinds, such as electrons, all behave the same way because we divide them by dispositions [Mumford]
|
26. Natural Theory / D. Laws of Nature / 1. Laws of Nature
|
14338
|
In the 'laws' view events are basic, and properties are categorical, only existing when manifested [Mumford]
|
26. Natural Theory / D. Laws of Nature / 3. Laws and Generalities
|
14339
|
Without laws, how can a dispositionalist explain general behaviour within kinds? [Mumford]
|
26. Natural Theory / D. Laws of Nature / 4. Regularities / a. Regularity theory
|
14341
|
Dretske and Armstrong base laws on regularities between individual properties, not between events [Mumford]
|
|
14340
|
It is a regularity that whenever a person sneezes, someone (somewhere) promptly coughs [Mumford]
|
26. Natural Theory / D. Laws of Nature / 8. Scientific Essentialism / b. Scientific necessity
|
14345
|
The necessity of an electron being an electron is conceptual, and won't ground necessary laws [Mumford]
|
26. Natural Theory / D. Laws of Nature / 8. Scientific Essentialism / d. Knowing essences
|
14307
|
Some dispositions are so far unknown, until we learn how to manifest them [Mumford]
|