Combining Texts
Ideas for
'The Roots of Reference', 'What is a Law of Nature?' and 'Chemistry'
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these texts
display all the ideas for this combination of texts
15 ideas
26. Natural Theory / A. Speculations on Nature / 6. Early Matter Theories / e. The One
17692
|
We can't deduce the phenomena from the One [Armstrong]
|
26. Natural Theory / B. Natural Kinds / 2. Defining Kinds
17478
|
Maybe two kinds are the same if there is no change of entropy on isothermal mixing [Hendry]
|
26. Natural Theory / C. Causation / 2. Types of cause
17689
|
Absences might be effects, but surely not causes? [Armstrong]
|
26. Natural Theory / D. Laws of Nature / 1. Laws of Nature
17662
|
Science depends on laws of nature to study unobserved times and spaces [Armstrong]
|
17682
|
A universe couldn't consist of mere laws [Armstrong]
|
26. Natural Theory / D. Laws of Nature / 2. Types of Laws
17690
|
Oaken conditional laws, Iron universal laws, and Steel necessary laws [Armstrong, by PG]
|
26. Natural Theory / D. Laws of Nature / 3. Laws and Generalities
17670
|
Newton's First Law refers to bodies not acted upon by a force, but there may be no such body [Armstrong]
|
26. Natural Theory / D. Laws of Nature / 4. Regularities / a. Regularity theory
8582
|
Regularities are lawful if a second-order universal unites two first-order universals [Armstrong, by Lewis]
|
17671
|
A naive regularity view says if it never occurs then it is impossible [Armstrong]
|
26. Natural Theory / D. Laws of Nature / 5. Laws from Universals
17681
|
The laws of nature link properties with properties [Armstrong]
|
16246
|
Rather than take necessitation between universals as primitive, just make laws primitive [Maudlin on Armstrong]
|
9480
|
Armstrong has an unclear notion of contingent necessitation, which can't necessitate anything [Bird on Armstrong]
|
26. Natural Theory / D. Laws of Nature / 8. Scientific Essentialism / a. Scientific essentialism
17479
|
The nature of an element must survive chemical change, so it is the nucleus, not the electrons [Hendry]
|
17485
|
Maybe water is the smallest part of it that still counts as water (which is H2O molecules) [Hendry]
|
17484
|
Maybe the nature of water is macroscopic, and not in the microstructure [Hendry]
|