Combining Texts

Ideas for 'works', 'Making Things Happen' and 'Principia Mathematica'

unexpand these ideas     |    start again     |     choose another area for these texts

display all the ideas for this combination of texts


14 ideas

27. Natural Reality / A. Classical Physics / 1. Mechanics / a. Explaining movement
Newton reclassified vertical motion as violent, and unconstrained horizontal motion as natural [Newton, by Harré]
     Full Idea: Following Kepler, Newton assumed a law of universal gravitation, thus reclassifying free fall as a violent motion and, with his First Law, fixing horizontal motion in the absence of constraints as natural
     From: report of Isaac Newton (Principia Mathematica [1687]) by Rom Harré - Laws of Nature 1
     A reaction: This is in opposition to the Aristotelian view, where the downward motion of physical objects is their natural motion.
27. Natural Reality / A. Classical Physics / 1. Mechanics / b. Laws of motion
Inertia rejects the Aristotelian idea of things having natural states, to which they return [Newton, by Alexander,P]
     Full Idea: Newton's principle of inertia implies a rejection of the Aristotelian idea of natural states to which things naturally return.
     From: report of Isaac Newton (Principia Mathematica [1687]) by Peter Alexander - Ideas, Qualities and Corpuscles 02.3
     A reaction: I think we can safely say that Aristotle was wrong about this. Aristotle made too much (such as the gravity acting on a thing) intrinsic to the bodies, when the whole context must be seen.
1: Bodies rest, or move in straight lines, unless acted on by forces [Newton]
     Full Idea: Law 1: Every body perseveres in its state of being at rest or of moving uniformly straight forward, except insofar as it is compelled to change its state by forces impressed.
     From: Isaac Newton (Principia Mathematica [1687], Axioms)
     A reaction: This is the new concept of inertia, which revolutionises the picture. Motion itself, which was a profound puzzle for the Greeks, ceases to be a problem by being axiomatised. It is now acceleration which is the the problem.
Newton's Third Law implies the conservation of momentum [Newton, by Papineau]
     Full Idea: Newton's Third Law implies the conservation of momentum, because 'action and reaction' are always equal.
     From: report of Isaac Newton (Principia Mathematica [1687]) by David Papineau - Thinking about Consciousness App 3
     A reaction: That is, the Third Law implies the First Law (which is the Law of Momentum).
3: All actions of bodies have an equal and opposite reaction [Newton]
     Full Idea: Law 3: To any action there is always an opposite and equal reaction; in other words, the action of two bodies upon each other are always equal and always opposite in direction.
     From: Isaac Newton (Principia Mathematica [1687], Axioms)
     A reaction: Is this still true if one body is dented by the impact and the other one isn't? What counts as a 'body'?
2: Change of motion is proportional to the force [Newton]
     Full Idea: Law 2: A change in motion is proportional to the motive force impressed and takes place along the straight line in which that force is impressed.
     From: Isaac Newton (Principia Mathematica [1687], Axioms)
     A reaction: This gives the equation 'force = mass x acceleration', where the mass is the constant needed for the equation of proportion. Effectively mass is just the value of a proportion.
27. Natural Reality / A. Classical Physics / 1. Mechanics / c. Forces
Newton's idea of force acting over a long distance was very strange [Heisenberg on Newton]
     Full Idea: Newton introduced a very new and strange hypothesis by assuming a force that acted over a long distance.
     From: comment on Isaac Newton (Principia Mathematica [1687]) by Werner Heisenberg - Physics and Philosophy 06
     A reaction: Why would a force that acted over a short distance be any less mysterious?
Newton introduced forces other than by contact [Newton, by Papineau]
     Full Idea: Newton allowed forces other than impact. All the earlier proponents of 'mechanical philosophy' took it as given that all physical action is by contact. ...He thought of 'impressed force' - disembodied entities acting from outside a body.
     From: report of Isaac Newton (Principia Mathematica [1687]) by David Papineau - Thinking about Consciousness App 3
     A reaction: This is 'action at a distance', which was as bewildering then as quantum theory is now. Newton had a divinity to impose laws of nature from the outside. In some ways we have moved back to the old view, with the actions of bosons and fields.
Newton's laws cover the effects of forces, but not their causes [Newton, by Papineau]
     Full Idea: Newton has a general law about the effects of his forces, ...but there is no corresponding general principle about the causes of such forces.
     From: report of Isaac Newton (Principia Mathematica [1687]) by David Papineau - Thinking about Consciousness App 3
     A reaction: I'm not sure that Einstein gives a cause of gravity either. This seems to be part of the scientific 'instrumentalist' view of nature, which is incredibly useful but very superficial.
Newton's forces were accused of being the scholastics' real qualities [Pasnau on Newton]
     Full Idea: Newton's reliance on the notion of force was widely criticised as marking in effect a return to real qualities.
     From: comment on Isaac Newton (Principia Mathematica [1687]) by Robert Pasnau - Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671 19.7
     A reaction: The objection is to forces that are separate from the bodies they act on. This is one of the reasons why modern metaphysics needs the concept of an intrinsic disposition or power, placing the forces in the stuff.
I am studying the quantities and mathematics of forces, not their species or qualities [Newton]
     Full Idea: I consider in this treatise not the species of forces and their physical qualities, but their quantities and mathematical proportions.
     From: Isaac Newton (Principia Mathematica [1687], 1.1.11 Sch)
     A reaction: Note that Newton is not denying that one might contemplate the species and qualities of forces, as I think Leibniz tried to do, thought he didn't cast any detailed light on them. It is the gap between science and metaphysics.
The aim is to discover forces from motions, and use forces to demonstrate other phenomena [Newton]
     Full Idea: The basic problem of philosophy seems to be to discover the forces of nature from the phenomena of motions and then to demonstrate the other phenomena from these forces.
     From: Isaac Newton (Principia Mathematica [1687], Pref 1st ed), quoted by Daniel Garber - Leibniz:Body,Substance,Monad 4
     A reaction: This fits in with the description-of-regularity approach to laws which Newton had acquired from Galileo, rather than the essentialist attitude to forces of Leibniz, though Newton has smatterings of essentialism.
27. Natural Reality / A. Classical Physics / 1. Mechanics / d. Gravity
Newton showed that falling to earth and orbiting the sun are essentially the same [Newton, by Ellis]
     Full Idea: Newton showed that the apparently different kinds of processes of falling towards the earth and orbiting the sun are essentially the same.
     From: report of Isaac Newton (Principia Mathematica [1687]) by Brian Ellis - Scientific Essentialism 3.08
     A reaction: I quote this to illustrate Newton's permanent achievement in science, in the face of a tendency to say that he was 'outmoded' by the advent of General Relativity. Newton wasn't interestingly wrong. He was very very right.
27. Natural Reality / A. Classical Physics / 2. Thermodynamics / c. Conservation of energy
Early Newtonians could not formulate conservation of energy, having no concept of potential energy [Newton, by Papineau]
     Full Idea: A barrier to the formulation of an energy conservation principle by early Newtonians was their lack of a notion of potential energy.
     From: report of Isaac Newton (Principia Mathematica [1687]) by David Papineau - Thinking about Consciousness App 3 n5
     A reaction: Interestingly, the notions of potentiality and actuality were central to Aristotle, but Newtonians had just rejected all of that.