Combining Texts

Ideas for 'Classical Cosmology (frags)', 'Concerning the Author' and 'Writings from Late Notebooks'

unexpand these ideas     |    start again     |     choose another area for these texts

display all the ideas for this combination of texts


4 ideas

27. Natural Reality / E. Cosmology / 1. Cosmology
Is the cosmos open or closed, mechanical or teleological, alive or inanimate, and created or eternal? [Robinson,TM, by PG]
     Full Idea: The four major disputes in classical cosmology were whether the cosmos is 'open' or 'closed', whether it is explained mechanistically or teleologically, whether it is alive or mere matter, and whether or not it has a beginning.
     From: report of T.M. Robinson (Classical Cosmology (frags) [1997]) by PG - Db (ideas)
     A reaction: A nice summary. The standard modern view is closed, mechanistic, inanimate and non-eternal. But philosophers can ask deeper questions than physicists, and I say we are entitled to speculate when the evidence runs out.
27. Natural Reality / G. Biology / 3. Evolution
Survival might undermine an individual's value, or prevent its evolution [Nietzsche]
     Full Idea: Something useful for maintaining the individual over time might be unfavourable to its strength and magnificence; what preserves the individual might simultaneously hold it fast and bring its evolution to a standstill.
     From: Friedrich Nietzsche (Writings from Late Notebooks [1887], 07[25])
     A reaction: He heads this 'Against Darwin', but I think Darwin could accommodate these observations, as he merely points out a mechanism, and makes not value judgements at all.
The utility of an organ does not explain its origin, on the contrary! [Nietzsche]
     Full Idea: The utility of an organ does not explain its origin, on the contrary!
     From: Friedrich Nietzsche (Writings from Late Notebooks [1887], 07[25])
     A reaction: This may be wishful thinking on Nietzsche's part, wanting the human mind to be free of its utility for survival, so that it can be focused on 'higher' things. We can explain by origin and purpose, but also by causal possibilities.
Darwin overestimates the influence of 'external circumstances' [Nietzsche]
     Full Idea: Darwin absurdly overestimates the influence of 'external circumstances'.
     From: Friedrich Nietzsche (Writings from Late Notebooks [1887], 07[25])
     A reaction: In some ways Nietzsche was just as bad as the Christians in his reluctance to face up to Darwin's idea. Does he really think that creatures evolve a certain way because they want to? Even fans of Nietzsche must bite the bullet of natural selection.