Combining Texts

Ideas for 'fragments/reports', 'Enquiry Conc Human Understanding' and 'On the Elements of Being: I'

unexpand these ideas     |    start again     |     choose another area for these texts

display all the ideas for this combination of texts


5 ideas

28. God / B. Proving God / 2. Proofs of Reason / b. Ontological Proof critique
It can never be a logical contradiction to assert the non-existence of something thought to exist [Hume]
     Full Idea: Whatever 'is' may 'not be'. No negation of a fact can involve a contradiction. The non-existence of any being, without exception, is as clear and distinct an idea as its existence.
     From: David Hume (Enquiry Conc Human Understanding [1748], XII.III.132)
28. God / B. Proving God / 3. Proofs of Evidence / c. Teleological Proof critique
You can't infer the cause to be any greater than its effect [Hume]
     Full Idea: If we infer a cause from an effect, we must proportion the one to the other. …a body of ten ounces raised in a scale proves the counterbalance exceeds ten ounces, but not that it exceeds a hundred.
     From: David Hume (Enquiry Conc Human Understanding [1748], XI.105)
28. God / B. Proving God / 3. Proofs of Evidence / e. Miracles
A miracle violates laws which have been established by continuous unchanging experience, so should be ignored [Hume]
     Full Idea: A miracle is a violation of the laws of nature, and as a firm and unalterable experience has established these laws, the proof against a miracle is as entire as any argument from experience can possible be imagined.
     From: David Hume (Enquiry Conc Human Understanding [1748], X.I.90)
All experience must be against a supposed miracle, or it wouldn't be called 'a miracle' [Hume]
     Full Idea: There must be a uniform experience against every miraculous event, otherwise the event would not merit that appellation.
     From: David Hume (Enquiry Conc Human Understanding [1748], X.I.90)
To establish a miracle the falseness of the evidence must be a greater miracle than the claimed miraculous event [Hume]
     Full Idea: No testimony is sufficient to establish a miracle, unless the testimony be of such a kind that its falsehood would be more miraculous than the fact which it endeavours to establish.
     From: David Hume (Enquiry Conc Human Understanding [1748], X.I.91)