display all the ideas for this combination of texts
11 ideas
7835 | The key question for Spinoza is: is his God really a God? [Stewart,M on Spinoza] |
Full Idea: The single most important question that can be raised about Spinoza's philosophy is: Is his God really a God? | |
From: comment on Baruch de Spinoza (The Ethics [1675]) by Matthew Stewart - The Courtier and the Heretic Ch.13 | |
A reaction: Novalis called Spinoza a "God-intoxicated man", but this question shows why many of Spinoza's contemporaries (and later) considered him to be an atheist. The general modern answer by commentators to the question appears to be 'No!'. |
7609 | God is the sum and principle of all eternal laws [Spinoza, by Armstrong,K] |
Full Idea: For Spinoza God is simply the principle of law, the sum of all the eternal laws in existence. | |
From: report of Baruch de Spinoza (The Ethics [1675]) by Karen Armstrong - A History of God Ch.9 | |
A reaction: This seems at variance with the usual view, that Spinoza identifies God with the single substance which makes up nature, and that he is hence a pantheist. Compare the above idea with Idea 4829, for example. Spinoza's God seems close to Aristotle's. |
17172 | God is a substance with infinite attributes [Spinoza] |
Full Idea: By God, I understand Being absolutely infinite, that is to say, substance consisting of infinite attributes, each one of which expresses eternal and infinite essence. | |
From: Baruch de Spinoza (The Ethics [1675], I Def 6) |
4823 | God does not act according to the freedom of the will [Spinoza] |
Full Idea: God does not act according to the freedom of the will. | |
From: Baruch de Spinoza (The Ethics [1675], I Pr 32) | |
A reaction: Personally I am struck by the idea that even if God had 'free will', I can't see how He would be sure of the fact (the unperceived puppetmaster!). However, I have actually come to the conclusion that a fotally 'free' will is an incoherent concept. |
21859 | God has no purpose, because God lacks nothing [Spinoza] |
Full Idea: If God works to obtain an end, He necessarily seeks something of which he stands in need. | |
From: Baruch de Spinoza (The Ethics [1675], IApp) | |
A reaction: The point is that a being with infinite attributes cannot be in need of anything, and hence God merely exists, but does not have a purpose. Hence falling in line with God's purposes cannot be an aim of a human religion. |
7571 | Spinoza's God is not a person [Spinoza, by Jolley] |
Full Idea: Spinoza's God is not a person. | |
From: report of Baruch de Spinoza (The Ethics [1675]) by Nicholas Jolley - Leibniz Ch.5 | |
A reaction: This will be the central reason why Spinoza was so controversial, because such a view instantly makes religion pointless, despite retaining a core of theism. |
4314 | God is wholly without passions, and strictly speaking does not love anyone [Spinoza, by Cottingham] |
Full Idea: God, asserts Spinoza, is wholly without passions, and strictly speaking does not love anyone. | |
From: report of Baruch de Spinoza (The Ethics [1675]) by John Cottingham - The Rationalists p.179 | |
A reaction: This seems to me a much more plausible conception of God than the anthropomorphic one of him as the perfect parent who dotes on his offspring. |
12928 | Spinoza's God is just power and necessity, without perfection or wisdom [Leibniz on Spinoza] |
Full Idea: The Spinozist view allows God infinite power only, not granting him either perfection or wisdom, and dismisses searches for final causes and explains everything through brute necessity. | |
From: comment on Baruch de Spinoza (The Ethics [1675]) by Gottfried Leibniz - New Essays on Human Understanding 73 | |
A reaction: It takes a genius like Leibniz to explain so clearly what Spinoza was up to. Some call Spinoza 'God-intoxicated', but others say he is an incipient atheist. The latter is probably closer to the truth. |
19435 | God is not loveable for producing without choice and by necessity; God is loveable for his goodness [Leibniz on Spinoza] |
Full Idea: There is nothing loveable in a God who produces without choice and by necessity, without discrimination of good and evil. The true love of God is founded not in necessity but in goodness. | |
From: comment on Baruch de Spinoza (The Ethics [1675], IV Pr 28) by Gottfried Leibniz - Comments on Spinoza's Philosophy | |
A reaction: This responds to Spinoza's claims about an 'intellectual' love of God. But why do we love people. It is possible that it is always for their goodness, but might we not love a great mathematician, simply for their wonderful mathematics? |
17231 | God feels no emotions, of joy or sorrow [Spinoza] |
Full Idea: God is free from passions, neither is He affected with any affect of joy or sorrow. | |
From: Baruch de Spinoza (The Ethics [1675], V Pr 17) | |
A reaction: The general Christian view is that God has great compassion for human suffering, as Jesus appears to have had. Spinoza was very very intellectual. |
4825 | To say that God promotes what is good is false, as it sets up a goal beyond God [Spinoza] |
Full Idea: Those who maintain that God acts in all things with a view of promoting what is good are very far from the truth. For they seem to set up something beyond God, which does not depend on God, but which God looks to as an exemplar or goal. | |
From: Baruch de Spinoza (The Ethics [1675], I Pr 33) | |
A reaction: That is, Spinoza agrees with Euthyphro, and disagrees with Socrates (see Idea 337). Personally I agree with Socrates, but then I am not 'intoxicated with God' as Spinoza was. If God isn't good, why worship Him? |