Combining Texts

Ideas for '', 'What Does It Take to Refer?' and 'Truthmaking for Presentists'

expand these ideas     |    start again     |     choose another area for these texts

display all the ideas for this combination of texts

---

9 ideas

5. Theory of Logic / A. Overview of Logic / 1. Overview of Logic

11211

If a sound conclusion comes from two errors that cancel out, the path of the argument must matter [Rumfitt]

5. Theory of Logic / C. Ontology of Logic / 1. Ontology of Logic

10454

In first-order we can't just assert existence, and it is very hard to deny something's existence [Bach]

5. Theory of Logic / E. Structures of Logic / 2. Logical Connectives / a. Logical connectives

11212

The sense of a connective comes from primitively obvious rules of inference [Rumfitt]

11210

Standardly 'and' and 'but' are held to have the same sense by having the same truth table [Rumfitt]

5. Theory of Logic / E. Structures of Logic / 3. Constants in Logic

10453

In logic constants play the role of proper names [Bach]

5. Theory of Logic / F. Referring in Logic / 1. Naming / b. Names as descriptive

10452

Proper names can be non-referential - even predicate as well as attributive uses [Bach]

5. Theory of Logic / F. Referring in Logic / 1. Naming / c. Names as referential

10456

Millian names struggle with existence, empty names, identities and attitude ascription [Bach]

5. Theory of Logic / F. Referring in Logic / 2. Descriptions / a. Descriptions

10440

An object can be described without being referred to [Bach]

5. Theory of Logic / F. Referring in Logic / 2. Descriptions / b. Definite descriptions

10444

Definite descriptions can be used to refer, but are not semantically referential [Bach]