display all the ideas for this combination of texts
4 ideas
13657 | First-order arithmetic can't even represent basic number theory [Shapiro] |
13358 | Ordinary or mathematical induction assumes for the first, then always for the next, and hence for all [Bostock] |
13359 | Complete induction assumes for all numbers less than n, then also for n, and hence for all numbers [Bostock] |
13656 | Some sets of natural numbers are definable in set-theory but not in arithmetic [Shapiro] |