display all the ideas for this combination of texts
2 ideas
8192 | I no longer think what a statement about the past says is just what can justify it [Dummett] |
Full Idea: In distinguishing between what can establish a statement about the past as true and what it is that that statement says, we are repudiating antirealism about the past. | |
From: Michael Dummett (Truth and the Past [2001], 3) | |
A reaction: This is a late shift of ground from the champion of antirealism. If Dummett's whole position is based on a 'justificationist' theory of meaning, he must surely have a different theory of meaning now for statements about the past? |
21628 | To say reality itself is vague is not properly intelligible [Dummett] |
Full Idea: The notion that things might actually be vague, as well as being vaguely described, is not properly intelligible. | |
From: Michael Dummett (Wang's Paradox [1970], p.260) | |
A reaction: It seems hard to disagree with this. It seems crazy that a pile of grain, or the hair on someone's head, are vague, and even quantum indeterminacies are not very well described as 'vague'. Vagueness is a very human concept. |