21821
|
Plato's Parmenides has a three-part theory, of Primal One, a One-Many, and a One-and-Many [Plato, by Plotinus]
|
|
Full Idea:
The Platonic Parmenides is more exact [than Parmenides himself]; the distinction is made between the Primal One, a strictly pure Unity, and a secondary One which is a One-Many, and a third which is a One-and-Many.
|
|
From:
report of Plato (Parmenides [c.364 BCE]) by Plotinus - The Enneads 5.1.08
|
|
A reaction:
Plotinus approves of this three-part theory. Parmenides has the problem that the highest Being contains no movement. By placing the One outside Being you can give it powers which an existent thing cannot have. Cf the concept of God.
|
9884
|
The distinction of concrete/abstract, or actual/non-actual, is a scale, not a dichotomy [Dummett]
|
|
Full Idea:
The distinction between concrete and abstract objects, or Frege's corresponding distinction between actual and non-actual objects, is not a sharp dichotomy, but resembles a scale upon which objects occupy a range of positions.
|
|
From:
Michael Dummett (Frege philosophy of mathematics [1991], Ch.18)
|
|
A reaction:
This might seem right if you live (as Dummett chooses to) in the fog of language, but it surely can't be right if you think about reality. Is the Equator supposed to be near the middle of his scale? Either there is an equator, or there isn't.
|