Combining Texts
Ideas for
'Unconscious Cerebral Initiative', 'works' and 'Vagueness'
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these texts
display all the ideas for this combination of texts
22 ideas
7. Existence / D. Theories of Reality / 10. Vagueness / a. Problem of vagueness
21601
|
A vague term can refer to very precise elements [Williamson]
|
21596
|
Vagueness undermines the stable references needed by logic [Williamson]
|
21589
|
When bivalence is rejected because of vagueness, we lose classical logic [Williamson]
|
7. Existence / D. Theories of Reality / 10. Vagueness / b. Vagueness of reality
21629
|
Equally fuzzy objects can be identical, so fuzziness doesn't entail vagueness [Williamson]
|
7. Existence / D. Theories of Reality / 10. Vagueness / c. Vagueness as ignorance
21591
|
Vagueness is epistemic. Statements are true or false, but we often don't know which [Williamson]
|
21619
|
If a heap has a real boundary, omniscient speakers would agree where it is [Williamson]
|
21620
|
The epistemic view says that the essence of vagueness is ignorance [Williamson]
|
21622
|
If there is a true borderline of which we are ignorant, this drives a wedge between meaning and use [Williamson]
|
9120
|
Vagueness in a concept is its indiscriminability from other possible concepts [Williamson]
|
7. Existence / D. Theories of Reality / 10. Vagueness / d. Vagueness as linguistic
21614
|
The 'nihilist' view of vagueness says that 'heap' is not a legitimate concept [Williamson]
|
21617
|
We can say propositions are bivalent, but vague utterances don't express a proposition [Williamson]
|
21625
|
The vagueness of 'heap' can remain even when the context is fixed [Williamson]
|
21618
|
If the vague 'TW is thin' says nothing, what does 'TW is thin if his perfect twin is thin' say? [Williamson]
|
7. Existence / D. Theories of Reality / 10. Vagueness / e. Higher-order vagueness
21590
|
Asking when someone is 'clearly' old is higher-order vagueness [Williamson]
|
7. Existence / D. Theories of Reality / 10. Vagueness / f. Supervaluation for vagueness
21592
|
Supervaluation keeps classical logic, but changes the truth in classical semantics [Williamson]
|
21603
|
You can't give a precise description of a language which is intrinsically vague [Williamson]
|
21604
|
Supervaluation assigns truth when all the facts are respected [Williamson]
|
21607
|
Supervaluation has excluded middle but not bivalence; 'A or not-A' is true, even when A is undecided [Williamson]
|
21608
|
Truth-functionality for compound statements fails in supervaluation [Williamson]
|
21609
|
Supervaluationism defines 'supertruth', but neglects it when defining 'valid' [Williamson]
|
21610
|
Supervaluation adds a 'definitely' operator to classical logic [Williamson]
|
21613
|
Supervaluationism cannot eliminate higher-order vagueness [Williamson]
|