Combining Texts
Ideas for
'In Defense of Essentialism', 'The Theodicy' and 'Mad Pain and Martian Pain'
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these texts
display all the ideas for this combination of texts
8 ideas
9. Objects / A. Existence of Objects / 5. Individuation / e. Individuation by kind
14193
|
'Substance theorists' take modal properties as primitive, without structure, just falling under a sortal [Paul,LA]
|
14195
|
If an object's sort determines its properties, we need to ask what determines its sort [Paul,LA]
|
14196
|
Substance essentialism says an object is multiple, as falling under various different sortals [Paul,LA]
|
9. Objects / C. Structure of Objects / 8. Parts of Objects / b. Sums of parts
14198
|
Absolutely unrestricted qualitative composition would allow things with incompatible properties [Paul,LA]
|
9. Objects / D. Essence of Objects / 2. Types of Essence
14190
|
Deep essentialist objects have intrinsic properties that fix their nature; the shallow version makes it contextual [Paul,LA]
|
9. Objects / D. Essence of Objects / 6. Essence as Unifier
14191
|
Deep essentialists say essences constrain how things could change; modal profiles fix natures [Paul,LA]
|
9. Objects / D. Essence of Objects / 15. Against Essentialism
14192
|
Essentialism must deal with charges of arbitrariness, and failure to reduce de re modality [Paul,LA]
|
14197
|
An object's modal properties don't determine its possibilities [Paul,LA]
|