|
22864
|
Philosophy is the study and criticsm of cultural beliefs, to achieve new possibilities [Dewey]
|
|
Full Idea:
Philosophy is criticism of the influential beliefs that underlie culture, tracking them to their generating conditions and results, and considering their mutual compatibility. This terminates in a new perspective, which leads to new possibilities.
|
|
From:
John Dewey (The Later Works (17 vols, ed Boydston) [1930], 6:19), quoted by David Hildebrand - Dewey Intro
|
|
A reaction:
[compressed] This would make quite a good manifesto for French thinkers of the 1960s. Foucault could hardly disagree. An excellent idea.
|
|
7548
|
Classes, grouped by a convenient property, are logical constructions [Russell]
|
|
Full Idea:
Classes or series of particulars, collected together on account of some property which makes it convenient to be able to speak of them as wholes, are what I call logical constructions or symbolic fictions.
|
|
From:
Bertrand Russell (The Ultimate Constituents of Matter [1915], p.125)
|
|
A reaction:
When does a construction become 'logical' instead of arbitrary? What is it about a property that makes it 'convenient'? At this point Russell seems to have built his ontology on classes, and the edifice was crumbling, thanks to Wittgenstein.
|
|
22873
|
Liberalism should improve the system, and not just ameliorate it [Dewey]
|
|
Full Idea:
Liberalism must become radical in the sense that, instead of using social power to ameliorate the evil consequences of the existing system, it shall use social power to change the system.
|
|
From:
John Dewey (The Later Works (17 vols, ed Boydston) [1930], 11:287), quoted by David Hildebrand - Dewey 4 'Dewey'
|
|
A reaction:
Conservative liberals ask what people want, and try to give it to them. Radical liberals ask what people actually need, and try to make it possible. The latter is bound to be a bit paternalistic, but will probably create a better world.
|
|
22869
|
Knowledge is either the product of competent enquiry, or it is meaningless [Dewey]
|
|
Full Idea:
Knowledge, as an abstract term, is a name for the product of competent enquiries. Apart from this relation, its meaning is so empty that any content or filling may be arbitrarily poured into it.
|
|
From:
John Dewey (The Later Works (17 vols, ed Boydston) [1930], 12:16), quoted by David Hildebrand - Dewey 2 'Knowledge'
|
|
A reaction:
What is the criterion of 'competent'? Danger of tautology, if competent enquiry is what produces knowledge.
|
|
22867
|
The quest for certainty aims for peace, and avoidance of the stress of action [Dewey]
|
|
Full Idea:
The quest for certainty is a quest for a peace which is assured, an object which is unqualified by risk and the shadow of fear which action costs.
|
|
From:
John Dewey (The Later Works (17 vols, ed Boydston) [1930], 4:7), quoted by David Hildebrand - Dewey 2 'Intro'
|
|
A reaction:
This is a characteristic pragmatist account. I think Dewey and Peirce offer us the correct attitude to certainty. It is just not available to us, and can only be a delusion. That doesn't mean we don't know anything, however!
|
|
7549
|
If my body literally lost its mind, the object seen when I see a flash would still exist [Russell]
|
|
Full Idea:
My meaning may be made plainer by saying that if my body could remain in exactly the same state in which it is, though my mind had ceased to exist, precisely that object which I now see when I see a flash would exist, though I should not see it.
|
|
From:
Bertrand Russell (The Ultimate Constituents of Matter [1915], p.126)
|
|
A reaction:
Zombies, 70 years before Robert Kirk! Sense-data are physical. It is interesting to see a philosopher as committed to empiricism, anti-spiritualism and the priority of science as this, still presenting an essentially dualist picture of perception.
|
|
22866
|
Mind is never isolated, but only exists in its interactions [Dewey]
|
|
Full Idea:
Mind is primarily a verb. ...Mind never denotes anything self-contained, isolated from the world of persons and things, but is always used with respect to situations, events, objects, persons and groups.
|
|
From:
John Dewey (The Later Works (17 vols, ed Boydston) [1930], 10:267), quoted by David Hildebrand - Dewey 1 'emerge'
|
|
A reaction:
I strongly agree with the idea that mind is a process, not a thing. Certain types of solitary introspection don't seem to quite fit his account, but in general he is right.
|
|
7546
|
A man is a succession of momentary men, bound by continuity and causation [Russell]
|
|
Full Idea:
The real man, I believe, however the police may swear to his identity, is really a series of momentary men, each different one from the other, and bound together, not by a numerical identity, but by continuity and certain instrinsic causal laws.
|
|
From:
Bertrand Russell (The Ultimate Constituents of Matter [1915], p.124)
|
|
A reaction:
This seems to be in the tradition of Locke and Parfit, and also follows the temporal-slices idea of physical objects. Personally I take a more physical view of things, and think the police are probably more reliable than Bertrand Russell.
|
|
7550
|
We could probably, in principle, infer minds from brains, and brains from minds [Russell]
|
|
Full Idea:
It seems not improbable that if we had sufficient knowledge we could infer the state of a man's mind from the state of his brain, or the state of his brain from the state of his mind.
|
|
From:
Bertrand Russell (The Ultimate Constituents of Matter [1915], p.131)
|
|
A reaction:
This strikes me as being a very good summary of the claim that mind is reducible to brain, which is the essence of physicalism. Had he been born a little later, Russell would have taken a harder line with physicalism.
|
|
7552
|
Six dimensions are needed for a particular, three within its own space, and three to locate that space [Russell]
|
|
Full Idea:
The world of particulars is a six-dimensional space, where six co-ordinates will be required to assign the position of any particular, three to assign its position in its own space, and three to assign the position of its space among the other spaces.
|
|
From:
Bertrand Russell (The Ultimate Constituents of Matter [1915], p.134)
|
|
A reaction:
Not a proposal that has caught on. One might connect the idea with the notion of 'frames of reference' in Einstein's Special Theory. Inside a frame of reference, three co-ordinates are needed; but where is the frame of reference?
|