8 ideas
22002 | Wolff's version of Leibniz dominated mid-18th C German thought [Pinkard] |
Full Idea: The dominant philosophy of mid-eighteenth century Germany was Wolffianism, a codified and almost legalistically organised form of Leibnizian thought. | |
From: Terry Pinkard (German Philosophy 1760-1860 [2002], Intro) | |
A reaction: Kant grew up in this intellectual climate. |
22021 | Romantics explored beautiful subjectivity, and the re-enchantment of nature [Pinkard] |
Full Idea: Early Romanticism can be seen as the exploration of subjective interiority and as the re-enchantment of nature (as organic). Hegel said they had the idea of a 'beautiful soul', which (he said) either paralysed action, or made them smug. | |
From: Terry Pinkard (German Philosophy 1760-1860 [2002], 06) | |
A reaction: [compressed, inc Note 1] A major dilemma of life is the extent of our social engagement, because it makes life worthwhile, but pollutes the mind with continual conflicts. |
22010 | The combination of Kant and the French Revolution was an excited focus for German philosophy [Pinkard] |
Full Idea: After the French Revolution, philosophy suddenly became the key rallying point for an entire generation of German intellectuals, who had been reading Kant as the harbinger of a new order. | |
From: Terry Pinkard (German Philosophy 1760-1860 [2002], Pt II Intro) | |
A reaction: Kant was a harbinger because he offered an autonomous status to each individual, rather than being subservient to a social order. |
22036 | In Hegel's time naturalism was called 'Spinozism' [Pinkard] |
Full Idea: In Hegel's time the shorthand for the Naturalistic worldview was 'Spinozism'. | |
From: Terry Pinkard (German Philosophy 1760-1860 [2002], 10) | |
A reaction: Spinozism hit Germany like a bomb in 1786, when it was reported that the poet Hölderlin was a fan of Spinoza. |
8972 | What in the real world could ground the distinction between the sets {A,{A,B}} and {B,{A,B}}? [Inwagen] |
Full Idea: Nothing in the world of nominalistically acceptable things could ground or explain the non-identity of the set {A,{A,B}} with the set {B,{A,B}}. | |
From: Peter van Inwagen (Existence,Ontological Commitment and Fictions [2003], p.154) | |
A reaction: [He cites Goodman for this thought] Van Inwagen is offering this to show that the existence of sets is abstract, whereas Goodman was denying the existence of sets altogether. I'm with Goodman. Nice example. |
22048 | Idealism is the link between reason and freedom [Pinkard] |
Full Idea: Idealism was conceived as a link between reason and freedom. | |
From: Terry Pinkard (German Philosophy 1760-1860 [2002], 14 Conc) | |
A reaction: I'm beginning to see the Romantic era as the Age of Freedom, which followed the Age of Reason. This idea fits that picture nicely. Pinkard says that paradoxes resulted from the attemptl |
3158 | Theories of intentionality presuppose rationality, so can't explain it [Dennett] |
Full Idea: Intentional theory is vacuous as psychology because it presupposes and does not explain rationality or intelligence. | |
From: Daniel C. Dennett (Brainstorms:Essays on Mind and Psychology [1978], p.15?) | |
A reaction: Virtually every philosophical theory seems to founder because it presupposes something like the thing it is meant to explain. I agree that 'intentionality' is a slightly airy concept that would probably reduce to something better. |
3159 | Beliefs and desires aren't real; they are prediction techniques [Dennett] |
Full Idea: Intentional systems don't really have beliefs and desires, but one can explain and predict their behaviour by ascribing beliefs and desires to them. This strategy is pragmatic, not right or wrong. | |
From: Daniel C. Dennett (Brainstorms:Essays on Mind and Psychology [1978], p.7?) | |
A reaction: If the ascription of beliefs and desires explains behaviour, then that is good grounds for thinking they might be real features of the brain, and even if that is not so, they are real enough as abstractions from brain events, like the 'economic climate'. |