Combining Texts

All the ideas for 'Conditionals', 'Enquiry concerning Principles of Morals' and 'Contextualist Solutions to Scepticism'

unexpand these ideas     |    start again     |     specify just one area for these texts


19 ideas

10. Modality / B. Possibility / 8. Conditionals / a. Conditionals
Validity can preserve certainty in mathematics, but conditionals about contingents are another matter [Edgington]
     Full Idea: If your interest in logic is confined to applications to mathematics or other a priori matters, it is fine for validity to preserve certainty, ..but if you use conditionals when arguing about contingent matters, then great caution will be required.
     From: Dorothy Edgington (Conditionals [2001], 17.2.1)
10. Modality / B. Possibility / 8. Conditionals / b. Types of conditional
There are many different conditional mental states, and different conditional speech acts [Edgington]
     Full Idea: As well as conditional beliefs, there are conditional desires, hopes, fears etc. As well as conditional statements, there are conditional commands, questions, offers, promises, bets etc.
     From: Dorothy Edgington (Conditionals [2001], 17.3.4)
10. Modality / B. Possibility / 8. Conditionals / c. Truth-function conditionals
Are conditionals truth-functional - do the truth values of A and B determine the truth value of 'If A, B'? [Edgington]
     Full Idea: Are conditionals truth-functional - do the truth values of A and B determine the truth value of 'If A, B'? Are they non-truth-functional, like 'because' or 'before'? Do the values of A and B, in some cases, leave open the value of 'If A,B'?
     From: Dorothy Edgington (Conditionals [2001], 17.1)
     A reaction: I would say they are not truth-functional, because the 'if' asserts some further dependency relation that goes beyond the truth or falsity of A and B. Logical ifs, causal ifs, psychological ifs... The material conditional ⊃ is truth-functional.
'If A,B' must entail ¬(A & ¬B); otherwise we could have A true, B false, and If A,B true, invalidating modus ponens [Edgington]
     Full Idea: If it were possible to have A true, B false, and If A,B true, it would be unsafe to infer B from A and If A,B: modus ponens would thus be invalid. Hence 'If A,B' must entail ¬(A & ¬B).
     From: Dorothy Edgington (Conditionals [2001], 17.1)
     A reaction: This is a firm defence of part of the truth-functional view of conditionals, and seems unassailable. The other parts of the truth table are open to question, though, if A is false, or they are both true.
13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 6. Contextual Justification / a. Contextualism
Contextualism needs a semantics for knowledge sentences that are partly indexical [Schiffer,S]
     Full Idea: Contextualist semantics must capture the 'indexical' nature of knowledge claims, the fact that different utterances of a knowledge sentence with no apparent indexical terms can express different propositions.
     From: Stephen Schiffer (Contextualist Solutions to Scepticism [1996], p.325), quoted by Keith DeRose - The Case for Contextualism 1.5
     A reaction: Schiffer tries to show that this is too difficult, and DeRose defends contextualism against the charge.
The indexical aspect of contextual knowledge might be hidden, or it might be in what 'know' means [Schiffer,S]
     Full Idea: One might have a 'hidden-indexical' theory of knowledge sentences: they contain constituents that are not the semantic values of any terms; ...or 'to know' itself might be indexical, as in 'I know[easy] I have hands' or 'I know[tough] I have hands'.
     From: Stephen Schiffer (Contextualist Solutions to Scepticism [1996], p.326-7), quoted by Keith DeRose - The Case for Contextualism 1.5
     A reaction: [very compressed] Given the choice, I would have thought it was in 'know', since to say 'either you know p or you don't' sounds silly to me.
22. Metaethics / B. Value / 2. Values / f. Altruism
The human heart has a natural concern for public good [Hume]
     Full Idea: While the human heart is compounded of the same elements as at present, it will never be wholly indifferent to public good.
     From: David Hume (Enquiry concerning Principles of Morals [1751], IX.I.222)
     A reaction: Even criminals can be patriotic. Why do people dump rubbish in beauty spots?
23. Ethics / A. Egoism / 1. Ethical Egoism
No moral theory is of any use if it doesn't serve the interests of the individual concerned [Hume]
     Full Idea: What theory of morals can ever serve any useful purpose, unless it can show, by a particular detail, that all the duties which it recommends, are also the true interest of each individual?
     From: David Hume (Enquiry concerning Principles of Morals [1751], IX.II.228)
     A reaction: It is hard to disagree, even if occasional cases of extreme altruism can occur.
23. Ethics / C. Virtue Theory / 1. Virtue Theory / a. Nature of virtue
Personal Merit is the possession of useful or agreeable mental qualities [Hume]
     Full Idea: Personal Merit consists altogether in the possession of mental qualities, useful or agreeable to the person himself or to others.
     From: David Hume (Enquiry concerning Principles of Morals [1751], IX.I.217)
     A reaction: If pleasure and utility can be intrinsically valuable, why can't virtue be as well?
23. Ethics / C. Virtue Theory / 3. Virtues / c. Justice
Justice only exists to support society [Hume]
     Full Idea: The necessity of justice to the support of society is the sole foundation of that virtue.
     From: David Hume (Enquiry concerning Principles of Morals [1751], III.II.163)
     A reaction: A sense of fairness precedes the building of a society, rather than arising out of it.
If we all naturally had everything we could ever desire, the virtue of justice would be irrelevant [Hume]
     Full Idea: Suppose nature has bestowed on humans such abundance of external conveniences that every individual is fully provided with whatever his appetites can want. …Justice, in that case, would be totally useless, and have no place in the catalogue of virtues.
     From: David Hume (Enquiry concerning Principles of Morals [1751], I.III.145)
     A reaction: [compressed] This seems to emphasise possessions and satisfaction of appetites, but presumably it would also need total security from other humans, which nature might struggle to provide. No sharing in this imagined world.
23. Ethics / D. Deontological Ethics / 2. Duty
Moral philosophy aims to show us our duty [Hume]
     Full Idea: The end of all moral speculations is to teach us our duty.
     From: David Hume (Enquiry concerning Principles of Morals [1751], I.136)
     A reaction: A surprising view from someone who thinks morals are basically sentiment.
23. Ethics / D. Deontological Ethics / 6. Motivation for Duty
Conclusions of reason do not affect our emotions or decisions to act [Hume]
     Full Idea: Inference and conclusions of the understanding have no hold of the affections nor set in motion the active powers of man.
     From: David Hume (Enquiry concerning Principles of Morals [1751], I.136)
     A reaction: I disagree. This is a typical empiricist separation of ideas from experience, of inner from outer, of analytic from synthetic.
23. Ethics / E. Utilitarianism / 1. Utilitarianism
Virtue just requires careful calculation and a preference for the greater happiness [Hume]
     Full Idea: The sole trouble which virtue demands is that of just calculation, and a steady preference for the greater happiness.
     From: David Hume (Enquiry concerning Principles of Morals [1751], IX.II.228)
     A reaction: Hume was the parent of utilitarianism. Can one person exhibit virtue on a desert island?
23. Ethics / E. Utilitarianism / 3. Motivation for Altruism
No one would cause pain to a complete stranger who happened to be passing [Hume]
     Full Idea: Would any man, who is walking along, tread as willingly on another's gouty toes, whom he has no quarrel with, as on the hard flint and pavement?
     From: David Hume (Enquiry concerning Principles of Morals [1751], V.II.183)
     A reaction: He is right that we empathise with the pain of others, and this is presumably one of the bases of morality. Animals lack sympathy for other animals.
Nature makes private affections come first, because public concerns are spread too thinly [Hume]
     Full Idea: It is wisely ordained by nature, that private connexions should commonly prevail over universal views and considerations; otherwise our affections and actions would be dissipated and lost, for want of a proper limited object.
     From: David Hume (Enquiry concerning Principles of Morals [1751], V.II.186n)
     A reaction: A very good objection to the excessively altruistic demands of utilitarianism.
24. Political Theory / B. Nature of a State / 1. Purpose of a State
The safety of the people is the supreme law [Hume]
     Full Idea: The safety of the people is the supreme law.
     From: David Hume (Enquiry concerning Principles of Morals [1751], III.II.157)
     A reaction: No political system ever seems able to disagree with this.
24. Political Theory / C. Ruling a State / 3. Government / a. Government
Society prefers helpful lies to harmful truth [Hume]
     Full Idea: Truths which are pernicious to society, if any such there be, will yield to errors which are salutary and advantageous.
     From: David Hume (Enquiry concerning Principles of Morals [1751], IX.II.228)
     A reaction: Hume probably meant religion. Two centuries later we have a greater appetite for uncomfortable truth.
25. Social Practice / B. Equalities / 4. Economic equality
If you equalise possessions, people's talents will make them unequal again [Hume]
     Full Idea: Render possessions ever so equal, men's different degrees of art, care, and industry will immediately break that equality.
     From: David Hume (Enquiry concerning Principles of Morals [1751], III.II.155)
     A reaction: This might not be so if there is a totalitarian restriction of economic freedom.