Combining Texts

All the ideas for 'Purifications (frags)', 'No Understanding without Explanation' and 'Through the Looking Glass'

unexpand these ideas     |    start again     |     specify just one area for these texts

---

4 ideas

7. Existence / A. Nature of Existence / 3. Being / e. Being and nothing

21982	I only wish I had such eyes as to see Nobody! It's as much as I can do to see real people. [Carroll,L]
	Full Idea: "I see nobody on the road," said Alice. - "I only wish I had such eyes," the King remarked. ..."To be able to see Nobody! ...Why, it's as much as I can do to see real people."
	From: Lewis Carroll (C.Dodgson) (Through the Looking Glass [1886], p.189), quoted by A.W. Moore - The Evolution of Modern Metaphysics 07.7
	A reaction: [Moore quotes this, inevitably, in a chapter on Hegel] This may be a better candidate for the birth of philosophy of language than Frege's Groundwork.

11. Knowledge Aims / A. Knowledge / 2. Understanding

14365	Scientific understanding is always the grasping of a correct explanation [Strevens]
	Full Idea: I defend what I call the 'simple view', that scientific understanding is that state produced, and only produced, by grasping a correct explanation.
	From: Michael Strevens (No Understanding without Explanation [2011], Intro)
	A reaction: I like this because it clearly states what I take to be the view of Aristotle, and the key to understanding the whole of that philosopher's system. I take the view to be correct.

14368	We may 'understand that' the cat is on the mat, but not at all 'understand why' it is there [Strevens]
	Full Idea: 'Understanding why' is quite separate from 'understanding that': you might be exquisitely, incandescently aware of the cat's being on the mat without having the slightest clue how it got there. My topic is understanding why.
	From: Michael Strevens (No Understanding without Explanation [2011], 2)
	A reaction: Can't we separate 'understand how' from 'understand why'? I may know that someone dropped a cat through my letterbox, but more understanding would still be required. (He later adds understanding 'with' a theory).

14369	Understanding is a precondition, comes in degrees, is active, and holistic - unlike explanation [Strevens]
	Full Idea: Objectors to the idea that understanding requires explanation say that understanding is a precondition for explanation, that understanding comes in degrees, that understanding is active, and that it is holistic - all unlike explanations.
	From: Michael Strevens (No Understanding without Explanation [2011], 4)
	A reaction: He works through these four objections and replies to them, in defence of the thesis in Idea 14365. I agree with Strevens on this.