Combining Texts

All the ideas for 'The Value of Science', 'On Simple Theories of a Complex World' and 'Remarks on the definition and nature of mathematics'

unexpand these ideas     |    start again     |     specify just one area for these texts

---

6 ideas

5. Theory of Logic / E. Structures of Logic / 8. Theories in Logic

17807	To study formal systems, look at the whole thing, and not just how it is constructed in steps [Curry]
	Full Idea: In the study of formal systems we do not confine ourselves to the derivation of elementary propositions step by step. Rather we take the system, defined by its primitive frame, as datum, and then study it by any means at our command.
	From: Haskell B. Curry (Remarks on the definition and nature of mathematics [1954], 'The formalist')
	A reaction: This is what may potentially lead to an essentialist view of such things. Focusing on bricks gives formalism, focusing on buildings gives essentialism.

6. Mathematics / C. Sources of Mathematics / 4. Mathematical Empiricism / c. Against mathematical empiricism

17806	It is untenable that mathematics is general physical truths, because it needs infinity [Curry]
	Full Idea: According to realism, mathematical propositions express the most general properties of our physical environment. This is the primitive view of mathematics, yet on account of the essential role played by infinity in mathematics, it is untenable today.
	From: Haskell B. Curry (Remarks on the definition and nature of mathematics [1954], 'The problem')
	A reaction: I resist this view, because Curry's view seems to imply a mad metaphysics. Hilbert resisted the role of the infinite in essential mathematics. If the physical world includes its possibilities, that might do the job. Hellman on structuralism?

6. Mathematics / C. Sources of Mathematics / 6. Logicism / d. Logicism critique

17808	Saying mathematics is logic is merely replacing one undefined term by another [Curry]
	Full Idea: To say that mathematics is logic is merely to replace one undefined term by another.
	From: Haskell B. Curry (Remarks on the definition and nature of mathematics [1954], 'Mathematics')

14. Science / B. Scientific Theories / 1. Scientific Theory

21687	It seems obvious to prefer the simpler of two theories, on grounds of beauty and convenience [Quine]
	Full Idea: It is not to be wondered that theory makers seek simplicity. When two theories are equally defensible on other counts, certainly the simpler of the two is to be preferred on the score of both beauty and convenience.
	From: Willard Quine (On Simple Theories of a Complex World [1960], p.255)
	A reaction: A simple application of Ockham's Razor. Quine goes on to nicely deconstruct what is involved in simplicity, and identify a certain amount of dubious prejudice in the concept.

21688	There are four suspicious reasons why we prefer simpler theories [Quine]
	Full Idea: We prefer simpler theories through wishful thinking, or a bias which slants the data, or a bias where the simpler hypothesis is more open to confirmation, or simpler hypotheses tolerating wider deviations in score-keeping.
	From: Willard Quine (On Simple Theories of a Complex World [1960], p.258)
	A reaction: [a compression of his summary of the paper] Quine is not dismissing our preference for simpler theories, but just very nicely inviting us to focus of aspects about which we should be cautious.

26. Natural Theory / D. Laws of Nature / 11. Against Laws of Nature

15877	The aim of science is just to create a comprehensive, elegant language to describe brute facts [Poincaré, by Harré]
	Full Idea: In Poincaré's view, we try to construct a language within which the brute facts of experience are expressed as comprehensively and as elegantly as possible. The job of science is the forging of a language precisely suited to that purpose.
	From: report of Henri Poincaré (The Value of Science [1906], Pt III) by Rom Harré - Laws of Nature 2
	A reaction: I'm often struck by how obscure and difficult our accounts of self-evident facts can be. Chairs are easy, and the metaphysics of chairs is hideous. Why is that? I'm a robust realist, but I like Poincaré's idea. He permits facts.