Combining Texts

All the ideas for 'fragments/reports', 'Leibniz' and 'Plural Quantification Exposed'

unexpand these ideas     |    start again     |     specify just one area for these texts

---

7 ideas

4. Formal Logic / F. Set Theory ST / 4. Axioms for Sets / n. Axiom of Comprehension

10779	A comprehension axiom is 'predicative' if the formula has no bound second-order variables [Linnebo]
	Full Idea: If φ contains no bound second-order variables, the corresponding comprehension axiom is said to be 'predicative'; otherwise it is 'impredicative'.
	From: Øystein Linnebo (Plural Quantification Exposed [2003], §1)
	A reaction: ['Predicative' roughly means that a new predicate is created, and 'impredicative' means that it just uses existing predicates]

5. Theory of Logic / A. Overview of Logic / 4. Pure Logic

10781	A 'pure logic' must be ontologically innocent, universal, and without presuppositions [Linnebo]
	Full Idea: I offer these three claims as a partial analysis of 'pure logic': ontological innocence (no new entities are introduced), universal applicability (to any realm of discourse), and cognitive primacy (no extra-logical ideas are presupposed).
	From: Øystein Linnebo (Plural Quantification Exposed [2003], §1)

5. Theory of Logic / G. Quantification / 6. Plural Quantification

10783	Plural quantification depends too heavily on combinatorial and set-theoretic considerations [Linnebo]
	Full Idea: If my arguments are correct, the theory of plural quantification has no right to the title 'logic'. ...The impredicative plural comprehension axioms depend too heavily on combinatorial and set-theoretic considerations.
	From: Øystein Linnebo (Plural Quantification Exposed [2003], §4)

10778	Can second-order logic be ontologically first-order, with all the benefits of second-order? [Linnebo]
	Full Idea: According to its supporters, second-order logic allow us to pay the ontological price of a mere first-order theory and get the corresponding monadic second-order theory for free.
	From: Øystein Linnebo (Plural Quantification Exposed [2003], §0)

9. Objects / A. Existence of Objects / 1. Physical Objects

10782	The modern concept of an object is rooted in quantificational logic [Linnebo]
	Full Idea: Our modern general concept of an object is given content only in connection with modern quantificational logic.
	From: Øystein Linnebo (Plural Quantification Exposed [2003], §2)
	A reaction: [He mentions Frege, Carnap, Quine and Dummett] This is the first thing to tell beginners in modern analytical metaphysics. The word 'object' is very confusing. I think I prefer 'entity'.

9. Objects / F. Identity among Objects / 7. Indiscernible Objects

7566	The Identity of Indiscernibles is really the same as the verification principle [Jolley]
	Full Idea: Various writers have noted that the Identity of Indiscernibles is really tantamount to the verification principle.
	From: Nicholas Jolley (Leibniz [2005], Ch.3)
	A reaction: Both principles are false, because they are the classic confusion of epistemology and ontology. The fact that you cannot 'discern' a difference between two things doesn't mean that there is no difference. Things beyond verification can still be discussed.

13. Knowledge Criteria / E. Relativism / 2. Knowledge as Convention

1556	By nature people are close to one another, but culture drives them apart [Hippias]
	Full Idea: I regard you all as relatives - by nature, not by convention. By nature like is akin to like, but convention is a tyrant over humankind and often constrains people to act contrary to nature.
	From: Hippias (fragments/reports [c.430 BCE]), quoted by Plato - Protagoras 337c8