|
8945
|
Fuzzy logic has many truth values, ranging in fractions from 0 to 1 [Fisher]
|
|
Full Idea:
In fuzzy logic objects have properties to a greater or lesser degree, and truth values are given as fractions or decimals, ranging from 0 to 1. Not-p is defined as 1-p, and other formula are defined in terms of maxima and minima for sets.
|
|
From:
Jennifer Fisher (On the Philosophy of Logic [2008], 07.II)
|
|
A reaction:
The question seems to be whether this is actually logic, or a recasting of probability theory. Susan Haack attacks it. If logic is the study of how truth is preserved as we move between propositions, then 0 and 1 need a special status.
|
|
8951
|
Classical logic is: excluded middle, non-contradiction, contradictions imply all, disjunctive syllogism [Fisher]
|
|
Full Idea:
For simplicity, we can say that 'classical logic' amounts to the truth of four sentences: 1) either p or not-p; 2) it is not the case that both p and not-p; 3) from p and not-p, infer q; 4) from p or q and not-p, infer q.
|
|
From:
Jennifer Fisher (On the Philosophy of Logic [2008], 12.I)
|
|
A reaction:
[She says there are many ways of specifying classical logic] Intuition suggests that 2 and 4 are rather hard to dispute, while 1 is ignoring some grey areas, and 3 is totally ridiculous. There is, of course, plenty of support for 3!
|
|
8950
|
Logic formalizes how we should reason, but it shouldn't determine whether we are realists [Fisher]
|
|
Full Idea:
Even if one is inclined to be a realist about everything, it is hard to see why our logic should be the determiner. Logic is supposed to formalize how we ought to reason, but whether or not we should be realists is a matter of philosophy, not logic.
|
|
From:
Jennifer Fisher (On the Philosophy of Logic [2008], 09.I)
|
|
A reaction:
Nice to hear a logician saying this. I do not see why talk in terms of an object is a commitment to its existence. We can discuss the philosopher's stone, or Arthur's sword, or the Loch Ness monster, or gravitinos, with degrees of commitment.
|
|
8944
|
Vagueness can involve components (like baldness), or not (like boredom) [Fisher]
|
|
Full Idea:
Vague terms come in at least two different kinds: those whose constituent parts come in discrete packets (bald, rich, red) and those that don't (beauty, boredom, niceness).
|
|
From:
Jennifer Fisher (On the Philosophy of Logic [2008], 07.II)
|
|
A reaction:
The first group seem to be features of the external world, and the second all occur in the mind. Baldness may be vague, but presumably hairs are (on the whole) not. Nature doesn't care whether someone is actually 'bald' or not.
|
|
5952
|
Rather than being the whole soul, maybe I am its chief part? [Plutarch]
|
|
Full Idea:
Is each of us not the soul, but the chief part of the soul, by which we think and reason and act, all the other parts of soul as well as of body being mere instruments of its power?
|
|
From:
Plutarch (74: Reply to Colotes [c.85], §1119)
|
|
A reaction:
Socrates is associated with the idea that I am my whole soul (Idea 1650). Plutarch represents an interesting development, which may lead both to the Christian 'soul' and to the Cartesian 'ego'. I think Plutarch is right, but what is the 'soul'?
|
|
5951
|
If atoms have no qualities, they cannot possibly produce a mind [Plutarch]
|
|
Full Idea:
Perception, mind, intelligence and thought cannot so much as be conceived, even with the best will, as arising among void and atoms, things which taken separately have no quality.
|
|
From:
Plutarch (74: Reply to Colotes [c.85], §1112)
|
|
A reaction:
A nice articulation of the intuition of all anti-physicalists. Plutarch would have to rethink his position carefully if he learned of the sheer number of connections in the brain, and of the theory of natural selection. His challenge remains, though.
|
|
5948
|
The good life involves social participation, loyalty, temperance and honesty [Plutarch]
|
|
Full Idea:
To live the good life is to live a life of participation in society, of loyalty to friends, of temperance and honest dealing.
|
|
From:
Plutarch (74: Reply to Colotes [c.85], §1108)
|
|
A reaction:
'Participation in society' is the interesting one. This might translate as 'doing your duty', or as 'leading a well-rounded life'. Solitude is wrong if you are indebted to others, and it is unhealthy if you are not. Is solitude really immoral, though?
|
|
20765
|
Man is a brave naked will, separate from a background of values and realities [Murdoch]
|
|
Full Idea:
Existentialists no longer see man against a background of values, of realities, which transcend him. We picture man as a brave naked will.
|
|
From:
Iris Murdoch (Against Dryness: a polemical sketch [1983], p.46), quoted by Kevin Aho - Existentialism: an introduction 7 'Subjectivism'
|
|
A reaction:
It is one thing to deny the values, and another to deny the realities. This piece is a 'polemic', and reads more like an exhortation than a truth. Many of us are, at best, cowardly naked wills.
|
|
5955
|
No one will ever find a city that lacks religious practices [Plutarch]
|
|
Full Idea:
A city without holy places and gods, without any observance of prayers, oaths, oracles, sacrifices for blessings received or rites to avert evils, no traveller has ever seen or will ever see.
|
|
From:
Plutarch (74: Reply to Colotes [c.85], §1125)
|
|
A reaction:
The nearest you might get would be Soviet Moscow, but in 1973 I saw a man there jeering at a woman who was kneeling in the street outside a closed church. Plutarch would be stunned at the decline in religious practices in modern Europe.
|