|
16960
|
If possibilitiy is relative, that might make accessibility non-transitive, and T the correct system [Dummett]
|
|
Full Idea:
If some world is 'a way the world might be considered to be if things were different in a certain respect', that might show that the accessibility relation should not be taken to be transitive, and we should have to adopt modal logic T.
|
|
From:
Michael Dummett (Could There Be Unicorns? [1983], 8)
|
|
A reaction:
He has already rejected symmetry from the relation, for reasons concerning relative identity. He is torn between T and S4, but rejects S5, and opts not to discuss it.
|
|
16958
|
In S4 the actual world has a special place [Dummett]
|
|
Full Idea:
In S4 logic the actual world is, in itself, special, not just from our point of view.
|
|
From:
Michael Dummett (Could There Be Unicorns? [1983], 8)
|
|
A reaction:
S4 lacks symmetricality, so 'you can get there, but you can't get back', which makes the starting point special. So if you think the actual world has a special place in modal metaphysics, you must reject S5?
|
|
21982
|
I only wish I had such eyes as to see Nobody! It's as much as I can do to see real people. [Carroll,L]
|
|
Full Idea:
"I see nobody on the road," said Alice. - "I only wish I had such eyes," the King remarked. ..."To be able to see Nobody! ...Why, it's as much as I can do to see real people."
|
|
From:
Lewis Carroll (C.Dodgson) (Through the Looking Glass [1886], p.189), quoted by A.W. Moore - The Evolution of Modern Metaphysics 07.7
|
|
A reaction:
[Moore quotes this, inevitably, in a chapter on Hegel] This may be a better candidate for the birth of philosophy of language than Frege's Groundwork.
|
|
16959
|
If possible worlds have no structure (S5) they are equal, and it is hard to deny them reality [Dummett]
|
|
Full Idea:
If our space of possible worlds has no structure, as in the semantics for S5, then, from the standpoint of the semantics, all possible worlds are on the same footing; it then becomes difficult to resist the claim that all are equally real.
|
|
From:
Michael Dummett (Could There Be Unicorns? [1983], 8)
|
|
A reaction:
This is a rather startling and interesting claim, given that modern philosophy seems full of thinkers who both espouse S5 for metaphysics, and also deny Lewisian realism about possible worlds. I'll ponder that one. Must read the new Williamson….
|
|
5963
|
Some say emotion is a sort of reason, and others say virtue concerns emotion [Plutarch]
|
|
Full Idea:
Some philosophers make the emotions varieties of reason, on the ground that all desire and grief and anger are judgments, while others declare that the virtues have to do with emotions, as when fear is the province of courage.
|
|
From:
Plutarch (68: Generation of the soul in 'Timaeus' [c.85], 1025d)
|
|
A reaction:
The second idea comes from Aristotle, but the second is interesting, and corresponds to the views coming from modern neuroscience, where even the most basic thought seems to involve emotion. What could be the motivation for 'pure' reason?
|
|
16954
|
Generalised talk of 'natural kinds' is unfortunate, as they vary too much [Dummett]
|
|
Full Idea:
In my view, Kripke's promotion of 'natural kinds', coverning chemical substances and animal and plant species, is unfortunate, since these are rather different types of things, and words used for them behave differently.
|
|
From:
Michael Dummett (Could There Be Unicorns? [1983], 2)
|
|
A reaction:
My view is that the only significant difference among natural kinds is their degree of stability in character. Presumably particles, elements and particular molecules are fairly invariant, but living things evolve.
|