|
9463
|
Classical logic is bivalent, has excluded middle, and only quantifies over existent objects [Jacquette]
|
|
Full Idea:
Classical logic (of Whitehead, Russell, Gödel, Church) is a two-valued system of propositional and predicate logic, in which all propositions are exclusively true or false, and quantification and predication are over existent objects only.
|
|
From:
Dale Jacquette (Intro to I: Classical Logic [2002], p.9)
|
|
A reaction:
All of these get challenged at some point, though the existence requirement is the one I find dubious.
|
|
19378
|
Early modern possibility is what occurs sometime; for Leibniz, it is what is not contradictory [Arthur,R]
|
|
Full Idea:
For Descartes, Hobbes and Spinoza, if a state of things is possible, it must occur at some time, whether past, present or future. For Leibniz possibility makes no reference to time; an individual is possible if its concept contains no contradiction.
|
|
From:
Richard T.W. Arthur (Leibniz [2014], 4 'Contingent')
|
|
A reaction:
It has always struck me as fallacious to say that anything that is possible must at some time occur. If '6' is possible on the die, what will constrain it to eventually come up when thrown? Mere non-contradiction doesn't imply possibility either.
|
|
15998
|
Perfect love is not in spite of imperfections; the imperfections must be loved as well [Kierkegaard]
|
|
Full Idea:
To love another in spite of his weaknesses and errors and imperfections is not perfect love. No, to love is to find him lovable in spite of, and together with, his weaknesses and errors and imperfections.
|
|
From:
Søren Kierkegaard (Works of Love [1847], p.158)
|
|
A reaction:
A true romantic at heart, Kierkegaard ideally posits perfect love as unconditional love, and not just of good attributes, predicates and conditions. However, the real question for both me and Kierkegaard is, is perfect love desirable or even possible?[SY]
|