19090
|
If we can't check our language against experience, philosophy is just comparing beliefs and words [Rorty]
|
|
Full Idea:
If we cannot check our language against non-linguistic awareness, then philosophy can never be more than a discussion of the utility and compatibility of beliefs - and, more particularly, of the various vocabularies in which those beliefs are formulated.
|
|
From:
Richard Rorty (Brandom on Social Practices and Representations [1998], iii.127), quoted by Danielle Macbeth - Pragmatism and Objective Truth p.178
|
|
A reaction:
I'm amazed at how many people I encounter in philosophy circles (compared with none at all outside those circles) who seem to think that we cannot check our language against our non-linguistic awareness. Rorty is their guru. Weird.
|
9110
|
The words 'thing' and 'to be' assert the same idea, as a noun and as a verb [William of Ockham]
|
|
Full Idea:
The words 'thing' and 'to be' (esse) signify one and the same thing, but the one in the manner of a noun and the other in the manner of a verb.
|
|
From:
William of Ockham (Summa totius logicae [1323], III,II,c,xxvii)
|
|
A reaction:
Well said - as you would expect from a thoroughgoing nominalist. I would have thought that this was the last word on the subject of Being, thus rendering any need for me to read Heidegger quite superfluous. Or am I missing something?
|
9109
|
If essence and existence were two things, one could exist without the other, which is impossible [William of Ockham]
|
|
Full Idea:
If essence and existence were two things, then no contradiction would be involved if God preserved the essence of a thing in the world without its existence, or vice versa, its existence without its essence; both of which are impossible.
|
|
From:
William of Ockham (Summa totius logicae [1323], III,II,c,xxvii)
|
|
A reaction:
Not that William is using the concept of a supreme mind as a tool in argument. His denial of essence as something separable is presumably his denial of the Aristotelian view of universals, as well as of the Platonic view.
|
9105
|
Some concepts for propositions exist only in the mind, and in no language [William of Ockham]
|
|
Full Idea:
Conceptual terms and the propositions formed by them are those mental words which do not belong to any language; they remain only in the mind and cannot be uttered exteriorly, though signs subordinated to these can be exteriorly uttered.
|
|
From:
William of Ockham (Summa totius logicae [1323], I.c.i)
|
|
A reaction:
[He cites Augustine] A glimmer of the idea of Mentalese, and is probably an integral part of any commitment to propositions. Quine would hate it, but I like it. Logicians seem to dislike anything that cannot be articulated, but brains are like that.
|
7076
|
Mill wondered if he would be happy if all his aims were realised, and answered no [Mill, by Critchley]
|
|
Full Idea:
Mill, in his crisis of 1827, asked himself whether he would be happy if all his objects in life were realised, and had to answer that he would not.
|
|
From:
report of John Stuart Mill (Autobiography [1870]) by Simon Critchley - Continental Philosophy - V. Short Intro Ch.3
|
|
A reaction:
The reply is either that happiness is in the striving, or that his aims in life were wrong, or that happiness is impossible. It seems to contradict Kant's definition (Idea 1452).
|