6 ideas
18151 | Could we replace sets by the open sentences that define them? [Chihara, by Bostock] |
19722 | We could know the evidence for our belief without knowing why it is such evidence [Mittag] |
19723 | Evidentialism can't explain that we accept knowledge claims if the evidence is forgotten [Mittag] |
19720 | Evidentialism concerns the evidence for the proposition, not for someone to believe it [Mittag] |
19721 | Coherence theories struggle with the role of experience [Mittag] |
7091 | The argument from analogy is not a strong inference, since the other being might be an actor or a robot [Grayling] |