15 ideas
12394 | If the result is bad, we change the rule; if we like the rule, we reject the result [Goodman] |
7306 | If the only property of a name was its reference, we couldn't explain bearerless names [Miller,A] |
14292 | Dispositions seem more ethereal than behaviour; a non-occult account of them would be nice [Goodman] |
7322 | Constitutive scepticism is about facts, and epistemological scepticism about our ability to know them [Miller,A] |
18749 | Goodman argued that the confirmation relation can never be formalised [Goodman, by Horsten/Pettigrew] |
17646 | Goodman showed that every sound inductive argument has an unsound one of the same form [Goodman, by Putnam] |
7325 | Dispositions say what we will do, not what we ought to do, so can't explain normativity [Miller,A] |
22186 | Mental modules are specialised, automatic, and isolated [Fodor, by Okasha] |
7324 | Explain meaning by propositional attitudes, or vice versa, or together? [Miller,A] |
7323 | If truth is deflationary, sentence truth-conditions just need good declarative syntax [Miller,A] |
7315 | 'Jones is a married bachelor' does not have the logical form of a contradiction [Miller,A] |
7328 | The principle of charity is holistic, saying we must hold most of someone's system of beliefs to be true [Miller,A] |
7329 | Maybe we should interpret speakers as intelligible, rather than speaking truth [Miller,A] |
7333 | The Frege-Geach problem is that I can discuss the wrongness of murder without disapproval [Miller,A] |
4794 | We don't use laws to make predictions, we call things laws if we make predictions with them [Goodman] |