12 ideas
18487 | We want to know what makes sentences true, rather than defining 'true' [McFetridge] |
12215 | The existence of numbers is not a matter of identities, but of constituents of the world [Fine,K] |
12211 | It is plausible that x^2 = -1 had no solutions before complex numbers were 'introduced' [Fine,K] |
12209 | The indispensability argument shows that nature is non-numerical, not the denial of numbers [Fine,K] |
12214 | 'Exists' is a predicate, not a quantifier; 'electrons exist' is like 'electrons spin' [Fine,K] |
12212 | Just as we introduced complex numbers, so we introduced sums and temporal parts [Fine,K] |
12216 | Real objects are those which figure in the facts that constitute reality [Fine,K] |
12218 | Being real and being fundamental are separate; Thales's water might be real and divisible [Fine,K] |
12217 | For ontology we need, not internal or external views, but a view from outside reality [Fine,K] |
18488 | We normally explain natural events by citing further facts [McFetridge] |
12213 | Ontological claims are often universal, and not a matter of existential quantification [Fine,K] |
19440 | How do you know you have conceived a thing deeply enough to assess its possibility? [Vaidya] |