14 ideas
19259 | If 2-D conceivability can a priori show possibilities, this is a defence of conceptual analysis [Vaidya] |
18270 | Choice suggests that intensions are not needed to ensure classes [Coffa] |
19262 | Essential properties are necessary, but necessary properties may not be essential [Vaidya] |
19267 | Define conceivable; how reliable is it; does inconceivability help; and what type of possibility results? [Vaidya] |
19268 | Inconceivability (implying impossibility) may be failure to conceive, or incoherence [Vaidya] |
19265 | Can you possess objective understanding without realising it? [Vaidya] |
18263 | The semantic tradition aimed to explain the a priori semantically, not by Kantian intuition [Coffa] |
18272 | Platonism defines the a priori in a way that makes it unknowable [Coffa] |
19260 | Gettier deductive justifications split the justification from the truthmaker [Vaidya] |
19266 | In a disjunctive case, the justification comes from one side, and the truth from the other [Vaidya] |
18266 | Mathematics generalises by using variables [Coffa] |
19264 | Aboutness is always intended, and cannot be accidental [Vaidya] |
13605 | Gravity isn't a force, because it produces effects without diminishing [Mayer] |
18279 | Relativity is as absolutist about space-time as Newton was about space [Coffa] |