13 ideas
| 9837 | 0 is not a number, as it answers 'how many?' negatively [Husserl, by Dummett] |
| 17435 | Objects do not naturally form countable units [Koslicki] |
| 9576 | Multiplicity in general is just one and one and one, etc. [Husserl] |
| 17439 | There is no deep reason why we count carrots but not asparagus [Koslicki] |
| 17433 | We can still count squares, even if they overlap [Koslicki] |
| 17434 | We struggle to count branches and waves because our concepts lack clear boundaries [Koslicki] |
| 17444 | Husserl said counting is more basic than Frege's one-one correspondence [Husserl, by Heck] |
| 17436 | We talk of snow as what stays the same, when it is a heap or drift or expanse [Koslicki] |
| 9575 | Husserl identifies a positive mental act of unification, and a negative mental act for differences [Husserl, by Frege] |
| 21214 | We clarify concepts (e.g. numbers) by determining their psychological origin [Husserl, by Velarde-Mayol] |
| 9819 | Psychologism blunders in focusing on concept-formation instead of delineating the concepts [Dummett on Husserl] |
| 9851 | Husserl wanted to keep a shadowy remnant of abstracted objects, to correlate them [Dummett on Husserl] |
| 16702 | All things are in the present time to God [Augustine] |