16 ideas
23548 | Indeterminacy is in conflict with classical logic [Fine,K] |
18812 | Split out the logical vocabulary, make an assignment to the rest. It's logical if premises and conclusion match [Tarski, by Rumfitt] |
13344 | X follows from sentences K iff every model of K also models X [Tarski] |
23539 | Classical semantics has referents for names, extensions for predicates, and T or F for sentences [Fine,K] |
13343 | A 'model' is a sequence of objects which satisfies a complete set of sentential functions [Tarski] |
23544 | Local indeterminacy concerns a single object, and global indeterminacy covers a range [Fine,K] |
23540 | Conjoining two indefinites by related sentences seems to produce a contradiction [Fine,K] |
23546 | Standardly vagueness involves borderline cases, and a higher standpoint from which they can be seen [Fine,K] |
23542 | Identifying vagueness with ignorance is the common mistake of confusing symptoms with cause [Fine,K] |
23541 | Supervaluation can give no answer to 'who is the last bald man' [Fine,K] |
23545 | We do not have an intelligible concept of a borderline case [Fine,K] |
3158 | Theories of intentionality presuppose rationality, so can't explain it [Dennett] |
23547 | It seems absurd that there is no identity of any kind between two objects which involve survival [Fine,K] |
3159 | Beliefs and desires aren't real; they are prediction techniques [Dennett] |
13345 | Sentences are 'analytical' if every sequence of objects models them [Tarski] |
23543 | We identify laws with regularities because we mistakenly identify causes with their symptoms [Fine,K] |