5 ideas
8502 | Realism doesn't explain 'a is F' any further by saying it is 'a has F-ness' [Devitt] |
8503 | The particular/universal distinction is unhelpful clutter; we should accept 'a is F' as basic [Devitt] |
8501 | Quineans take predication about objects as basic, not reference to properties they may have [Devitt] |
13128 | 'Ultimate sortals' cannot explain ontological categories [Westerhoff on Wiggins] |
9155 | An a priori proof is independent of experience [Leibniz] |