11 ideas
9390 | Logic guides thinking, but it isn't a substitute for it [Rumfitt] |
14596 | Call 'nominalism' the denial of numbers, properties, relations and sets [Dorr] |
14597 | Natural Class Nominalism says there are primitive classes of things resembling in one respect [Dorr] |
9389 | Vague membership of sets is possible if the set is defined by its concept, not its members [Rumfitt] |
20475 | Maybe modal sentences cannot be true or false [Casullo] |
14598 | Abstracta imply non-logical brute necessities, so only nominalists can deny such things [Dorr] |
20476 | If the necessary is a priori, so is the contingent, because the same evidence is involved [Casullo] |
20471 | Epistemic a priori conditions concern either the source, defeasibility or strength [Casullo] |
20477 | The main claim of defenders of the a priori is that some justifications are non-experiential [Casullo] |
20472 | Analysis of the a priori by necessity or analyticity addresses the proposition, not the justification [Casullo] |
20474 | 'Overriding' defeaters rule it out, and 'undermining' defeaters weaken in [Casullo] |