18 ideas
18889 | Ostensive definitions needn't involve pointing, but must refer to something specific [Salmon,N] |
14627 | S4, and therefore S5, are invalid for metaphysical modality [Salmon,N, by Williamson] |
23548 | Indeterminacy is in conflict with classical logic [Fine,K] |
23539 | Classical semantics has referents for names, extensions for predicates, and T or F for sentences [Fine,K] |
23544 | Local indeterminacy concerns a single object, and global indeterminacy covers a range [Fine,K] |
23540 | Conjoining two indefinites by related sentences seems to produce a contradiction [Fine,K] |
23546 | Standardly vagueness involves borderline cases, and a higher standpoint from which they can be seen [Fine,K] |
23542 | Identifying vagueness with ignorance is the common mistake of confusing symptoms with cause [Fine,K] |
23541 | Supervaluation can give no answer to 'who is the last bald man' [Fine,K] |
14082 | No sortal could ever exactly pin down which set of particles count as this 'cup' [Schaffer,J] |
23545 | We do not have an intelligible concept of a borderline case [Fine,K] |
18888 | Essentialism says some properties must be possessed, if a thing is to exist [Salmon,N] |
14081 | Identities can be true despite indeterminate reference, if true under all interpretations [Schaffer,J] |
23547 | It seems absurd that there is no identity of any kind between two objects which involve survival [Fine,K] |
18886 | Frege's 'sense' solves four tricky puzzles [Salmon,N] |
18887 | The perfect case of direct reference is a variable which has been assigned a value [Salmon,N] |
18891 | Nothing in the direct theory of reference blocks anti-essentialism; water structure might have been different [Salmon,N] |
23543 | We identify laws with regularities because we mistakenly identify causes with their symptoms [Fine,K] |