Combining Texts

All the ideas for 'talk', 'Moral Dilemmas Revisited' and 'Nihilism without Self-Contradiction'

expand these ideas     |    start again     |     specify just one area for these texts

---

6 ideas

2. Reason / F. Fallacies / 7. Ad Hominem

14231

We should always apply someone's theory of meaning to their own utterances [Liggins]

5. Theory of Logic / G. Quantification / 6. Plural Quantification

14232

We normally formalise 'There are Fs' with singular quantification and predication, but this may be wrong [Liggins]

9. Objects / C. Structure of Objects / 8. Parts of Objects / a. Parts of objects

14233

Nihilists needn't deny parts - they can just say that some of the xs are among the ys [Liggins]

14. Science / C. Induction / 5. Paradoxes of Induction / b. Raven paradox

7006	Observing irrelevant items supports both 'all x are y' and 'all x are non-y', revealing its absurdity [Schofield,J]

20. Action / C. Motives for Action / 5. Action Dilemmas / a. Dilemmas

22481

There is no restitution after a dilemma, if it only involved the agent, or just needed an explanation [Foot, by PG]

22482

I can't understand how someone can be necessarily wrong whatever he does [Foot]