14 ideas
| 20955 | Art can make reason more all-inclusive, by articulating what seemed inexpressible [Bowie] |
| 17435 | Objects do not naturally form countable units [Koslicki] |
| 17433 | We can still count squares, even if they overlap [Koslicki] |
| 17439 | There is no deep reason why we count carrots but not asparagus [Koslicki] |
| 17434 | We struggle to count branches and waves because our concepts lack clear boundaries [Koslicki] |
| 10735 | Abstraction from objects won't reveal an operation's being performed 'so many times' [Geach] |
| 17436 | We talk of snow as what stays the same, when it is a heap or drift or expanse [Koslicki] |
| 20950 | German Idealism says our thinking and nature have the same rational structure [Bowie] |
| 10732 | If concepts are just recognitional, then general judgements would be impossible [Geach] |
| 20942 | Nazis think race predetermines the self [Bowie] |
| 10731 | For abstractionists, concepts are capacities to recognise recurrent features of the world [Geach] |
| 10733 | The abstractionist cannot explain 'some' and 'not' [Geach] |
| 10734 | Only a judgement can distinguish 'striking' from 'being struck' [Geach] |
| 20946 | Rhetoric is built into language, so it cannot be stripped from philosophy [Bowie] |