8 ideas
10528 | Definitions concern how we should speak, not how things are [Fine,K] |
14231 | We should always apply someone's theory of meaning to their own utterances [Liggins] |
14232 | We normally formalise 'There are Fs' with singular quantification and predication, but this may be wrong [Liggins] |
10529 | If Hume's Principle can define numbers, we needn't worry about its truth [Fine,K] |
10530 | Hume's Principle is either adequate for number but fails to define properly, or vice versa [Fine,K] |
14233 | Nihilists needn't deny parts - they can just say that some of the xs are among the ys [Liggins] |
10527 | An abstraction principle should not 'inflate', producing more abstractions than objects [Fine,K] |
20558 | Your representative owes you his judgement, and betrays you if he gives your opinion instead [Burke] |