6 ideas
10528 | Definitions concern how we should speak, not how things are [Fine,K] |
10529 | If Hume's Principle can define numbers, we needn't worry about its truth [Fine,K] |
10530 | Hume's Principle is either adequate for number but fails to define properly, or vice versa [Fine,K] |
14248 | We could accept the integers as primitive, then use sets to construct the rest [Cohen] |
9558 | All scientific tests will verify mathematics, so it is a background, not something being tested [Sober] |
10527 | An abstraction principle should not 'inflate', producing more abstractions than objects [Fine,K] |