8 ideas
10528 | Definitions concern how we should speak, not how things are [Fine,K] |
10529 | If Hume's Principle can define numbers, we needn't worry about its truth [Fine,K] |
10530 | Hume's Principle is either adequate for number but fails to define properly, or vice versa [Fine,K] |
20752 | For man, being is not what he is, but what he is going to be [Ortega y Gassett] |
13745 | Supervenience is not a dependence relation, on the lines of causal, mereological or semantic dependence [Kim] |
13746 | Supervenience is just a 'surface' relation of pattern covariation, which still needs deeper explanation [Kim] |
10527 | An abstraction principle should not 'inflate', producing more abstractions than objects [Fine,K] |
20756 | Instead of having a nature, man only has a history [Ortega y Gassett] |